Representing Unique Stakeholder Perspectives in BPM Notations

Monsalve, Carlos; April, Alain; Abran, Alain

doi:10.1109/sera.2010.16

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accidental difficulties: − Inadequate requirements elicitation practices, when the customers cannot articulate requirements or they are not involved enough in the requirements engineering process. − Rework and miscommunications due to many notations that are utilized by different stakeholders, like BPMN and UML [8] − Deficiencies in backward traceability make it difficult to keep consistency between documentation and the underlying information system [9,10] 3. Challenges:…”

Section: Essential Difficultiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exact requirements engineering for developing business process models

Nosrati

2017

2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Process modeling is a suitable tool for improving the business processes. Successful process modeling strongly depends on correct requirements engineering. In this paper, we proposed a combination approach for requirements elicitation for developing business models. To do this, BORE (Business-Oriented Requirements Engineering) method is utilized as the base of our work and it is enriched by the important features of the BDD (Business-driven development) method, in order to make the proposed approach appropriate for modeling the more complex processes. As the main result, our method eventuates in exact requirements elicitation that adapts the customers' needs. Also, it let us avoid any rework in the modeling of process. In this paper, we conduct a case study for the paper submission and publication system of a journal. The results of this study not only give a good experience of real world application of proposed approach on a web-based system, also it approves the proficiency of this approach for modeling the complex systems with many sub-processes and complicated relationships.

show abstract

Section: Essential Difficultiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exact requirements engineering for developing business process models

Nosrati

2017

2017 3th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One has to think that the understanding should take into consideration the target audience of the artefact and not always something that offers lots of information helps. There has been several business process modeling notations over the years as discussed (Monsalve et al 2010) -however, till date there is not one notation to satisfy all.…”

Section: Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Framework Modeling for Business Process Requirement Analysis

Pande¹

2017

IJRET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the next part of this paper, we propose a solution to this problem in the form of a multiperspective graphical representation that combines as many different control perspectives as possible. The proposed approach builds on the concepts published by Monsalve, April, and Abran [1], who proposed a multiperspective BPM notation that identifies the specific BPM constructs preferred by stakeholders. Before describing the proposed multiperspective framework in more detail, a synthesis is required of the many different approaches currently used to graphically represent hierarchical information (such as internal controls).…”

Section: Existing Internal Control Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite awareness of the importance of internal controls and recent research proposals in the field of multiperspective business process analysis [1], there is currently no methodology that helps with the implementation of internal controls that consider more than one perspective in a business process representation. Today, internal control representation is often too specific and only oriented toward one perspective (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiperspective Representation of Internal Controls in Business Processes

Abdellatif

April

2012

JSEA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The internal control process, which is designed to help an organization accomplish specific control objectives, is one of the most important processes, as it can determine whether or not the organization is in compliance with its internal or external requirements. Internal controls emerge from different perspectives. Currently, experts view and act on one control perspective at a time, which creates inefficiencies and duplication. This software engineering research is aimed at proposing a multiperspective framework for representing internal controls, in order to obtain a centralized and comprehensive view of all internal control mechanisms. To carry out this research, we also needed to represent the many different stakeholder perspectives of internal controls. Based on a literature review of mathematical and psychological analysis, we searched for the most suitable multiperspective representation of internal controls, and assessed the many representation options using the AHP (analytical hierarchical process) sensitivity analysis approach. This approach has been applied to a study group which has been called to answer to a questionnaire.

show abstract

Representing Unique Stakeholder Perspectives in BPM Notations

Cited by 7 publications

References 36 publications

Exact requirements engineering for developing business process models

Exact requirements engineering for developing business process models

Framework Modeling for Business Process Requirement Analysis

Multiperspective Representation of Internal Controls in Business Processes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About