2005
DOI: 10.1080/09538250500147189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing the production and circulation of commodities in material terms: On Sraffa's objectivism

Abstract: The paper discusses Sraffa's interpretation of the classical economists and, following their lead, his elaboration of an objectivist, surplus-based theory of value and distribution. The emphasis is on the twin concepts of physical real costs and social surplus on the one hand and that of a circular flow of production on the other. In order to determine relative prices within such an analytical scheme, the tool of simultaneous equations is indispensable. It is then argued that fixed capital turned out to be a f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These conclusions rest on a model which has been so far based mainly on accounting relationships (see, for some motivations of this methodological "objectivism", Kurz and Salvadori, 2005). These relationships are in this Section supplemented with two behavioural hypotheses in order to make some conjectures about the potential dynamics of the monetary union.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conclusions rest on a model which has been so far based mainly on accounting relationships (see, for some motivations of this methodological "objectivism", Kurz and Salvadori, 2005). These relationships are in this Section supplemented with two behavioural hypotheses in order to make some conjectures about the potential dynamics of the monetary union.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be sure, in the early times in which he fi rst conceived the idea of writing a book on the theory of value, Sraffa had in mind a specifi c determinant of relative prices, which was "physical real cost." With the "no-surplus" equations, he was trying to formalize the old conception of William Petty, as the most convincing exegetic works based on the unpublished manuscripts have argued (Kurz 2002;Kurz and Salvadori 2005;Gehrke and Kurz, this issue). Whatever reason (perhaps a good one) Sraffa had for omitting any reference to this conception in the book, it is nevertheless of some interest to note that our analysis of the "arithmetic of exchange" can also be interpreted in terms of "physical real cost."…”
Section: Sraffaʼs Equations and "Physical Real Cost"mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…14 For more details, see Kurz and Salvadori (2005). 15 Sraffa, in fact, thought to be able to cover not only renewable natural resources, such as lands of unchanging qualities, but also exhaustible resources, such as mineral ores and oil deposits.…”
Section: A 'Purely Mystical Conception'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Garegnani (2005).4 For more details, seeKurz and Salvadori (2005).5 To distance himself from Marshall, Sraffa coined the term 'physical real cost', but later switched to 'physical cost'.6 While Sraffa associated the physical real cost approach with Petty and his notion of 'the days food of an adult Man, at a Medium', he also pointed out that it was the latter notion which led to the adoption of labour as a common measure of value by the classical economists and Marx. In an undated document he noted, under the heading 'Physical real cost',…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%