2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-008-9186-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Spatial Uncertainty Using Distances and Kernels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following statistical and visualisation tools were employed: (1) cross-correlation functions for identifying temporal offsets in hydrological response; (2) a combination of multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and k-means algorithm for clustering the loggers (Borg & Groenen, 1997;Scheidt & Caers, 2009). …”
Section: Data Treatment and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following statistical and visualisation tools were employed: (1) cross-correlation functions for identifying temporal offsets in hydrological response; (2) a combination of multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and k-means algorithm for clustering the loggers (Borg & Groenen, 1997;Scheidt & Caers, 2009). …”
Section: Data Treatment and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural question to address is how to choose the number of scenarios to consider. This is a well-studied topic in stochastic optimization (Dupacova et al, 2003) and other fields (Scheidt and Caers, 2009). The case studies presented in this paper use 20 scenarios because past work, such as the work in Albor and Dimitrakopoulos (2009), indicates that after about 15 simulated representations of an orebody, stochastic schedules converge to a stable final physical schedule as well as stable forecasts of production performance.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The scenarios are equiprobable (ie, π s = 1/S ∀s = 1, …, S), and they were generated from a limited amount of drilling information using the geostatistical techniques of conditional simulation (Goovaerts, 1997;Scheidt and Caers, 2009;Boucher and Dimitrakopoulos, 2012). These techniques can be seen as a complex Monte Carlo simulation framework.…”
Section: Current Solution Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enables transformation of data points from the input space R Na to some (possibly) higher dimensional space Y, where inner products are used to extract features in the data which are not available in R Na . This has been exploited in many branches of science, for example machine learning (see, e.g., [36][37][38][39]) and reservoir geostatistics (see, e.g., [40,41]). …”
Section: Shape Prior Regularization Termmentioning
confidence: 99%