2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-016-1292-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing spatial dependence and spatial discontinuity in ecological epidemiology: a scale mixture approach

Abstract: Variation in disease risk underlying observed disease counts is increasingly a focus for Bayesian spatial modelling, including applications in spatial data mining. Bayesian analysis of spatial data, whether for disease or other types of event, often employs a conditionally autoregressive prior, which can express spatial dependence commonly present in underlying risks or rates. Such conditionally autoregressive priors typically assume a normal density and uniform local smoothing for underlying risks. However, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating the joint spatial distribution of multiple diseases will better outperform the underlying risks than it would be obtained from the univariate analysis. For example, recent developments of theory and applications of multivariate joint modelling can be found in the literature [39][40][41] and a scale mixture approach for spatial dependence was proposed by 42 as a recent contribution in this field.…”
Section: Joint Disease Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the joint spatial distribution of multiple diseases will better outperform the underlying risks than it would be obtained from the univariate analysis. For example, recent developments of theory and applications of multivariate joint modelling can be found in the literature [39][40][41] and a scale mixture approach for spatial dependence was proposed by 42 as a recent contribution in this field.…”
Section: Joint Disease Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common way of carrying out statistical spatial smoothing is to specifically include terms to account for spatial autocorrelation and sampling variability so as to satisfy model assumptions and reduce uncertainty of the estimates. This approach models the observed data using a Bayesian generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) [44,45] to augment the linear predictor with a set of spatially autocorrelated random effects. This spatial correlation between areas is readily incorporated through the prior information, and recognizing that neighbouring geographical areas are more likely to share similar characteristics (i.e.…”
Section: Spatial Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules have been studied by Ugarte et al. 15,16 Other approaches based on hierarchical modelling include Lee and Mitchell, 17 Wakefield and Kim, 18 Charras-Garrido et al., 19 Hossain and Lawson 20 and Congdon, 21 but these are beyond the reach of most practitioners and health researchers and are difficult to apply if specific software or code is not provided. Recently, Anderson et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%