Representing Process Characteristics to Increase Confidence in Assurance Case Arguments

Jarzębowicz, Aleksander; Markiewicz, Szymon

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19501-4_24

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, it is no secret that nowadays, information and communication technologies (ICT) are the basic means to efficiently support every phase of the KM process. However, diverse technologies, such as knowledge management systems, knowledge discovery systems and knowledgebased systems are currently working with different types of knowledge [20,21,22]. In our paper knowledge management is a term for any operations focused on knowledge granulas embracing all typical phases: discovering, registering, transformation and utilization.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamical Aspects of Knowledge Evolution

Owoc

Weichbroth

2019

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Undeniably, in this rapidly changing world some knowledge granules change over time. Tracking these changes seems to be one of the most crucial processes in knowledge management. Every potential change is a result of knowledge adoption and application to solve a given problem or task in particular domains. However, there is a lack of a model that provides an eventdriven framework, along with the core adoption process explicitly expressed with related factors, which together serve as an efficient tool to adopt and reuse knowledge on one hand, while on the other, to measure and evaluate the various aspects of knowledge quality and usefulness. This paper aims to fill this gap by introducing a knowledge adoption process and an ontology-aided encapsulation knowledge (OAKE) model. While the former breaks down the tacit adoption process into two explicit sub-processes and measurable factors, the latter exposes knowledge evolution over time by a sequence of recorded events.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%