2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2019.100186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing oncology in datasets: Standard or custom biomedical terminology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Term identification is crucial for many tasks of automated biomedical text processing of biomedical [ 7 – 14 ], with CVs as fundamental resources [ 15 ]. We have proposed and validated a method not only to harvest terminology from texts but to classify texts by clinical specialties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Term identification is crucial for many tasks of automated biomedical text processing of biomedical [ 7 – 14 ], with CVs as fundamental resources [ 15 ]. We have proposed and validated a method not only to harvest terminology from texts but to classify texts by clinical specialties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies rely on controlled vocabularies (CVs) in different flavors, known as dictionaries, lexicons, terminologies and ontologies[ 15 ]. They are curated by experts and public bodies and are mostly tailored to specific purposes like disease or adverse event reporting, annotation of health records for billing, data collection for clinical research, and literature indexing.…”
Section: Background and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that clinical narratives are often characterized by complete freedom in text design, forms a contrast with the enormous amount of effort invested in vocabulary normalization over decades ( 16 ). To name just a few, ICD-10 ( 17 ) is a worldwide standard for encoding medical conditions.…”
Section: The Perspective Of Human Languagementioning
confidence: 99%