2003
DOI: 10.2979/nws.2003.15.2.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Domestic Violence: Ambivalence and Difference inWhat's Love Got to Do with It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Westbrook (2009) suggested that perceptions are often influenced by domestic violence myths, which refer to misconceptions and false beliefs about IPV, abusers, and victims. Whereas individual adherence to domestic violence myths has been explored in multiple studies (Peters, 2008; Policastro & Payne, 2013; Westbrook, 2009), scholars have just recently begun to explore the perpetuation of IPV and domestic violence myths in popular media (Franiuk & Coleman Apa, 2017; Shoos, 2003). One area that has been overlooked is the comic book as a medium for highlighting social values, beliefs, and perceptions, particularly in regard to IPV and domestic violence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Westbrook (2009) suggested that perceptions are often influenced by domestic violence myths, which refer to misconceptions and false beliefs about IPV, abusers, and victims. Whereas individual adherence to domestic violence myths has been explored in multiple studies (Peters, 2008; Policastro & Payne, 2013; Westbrook, 2009), scholars have just recently begun to explore the perpetuation of IPV and domestic violence myths in popular media (Franiuk & Coleman Apa, 2017; Shoos, 2003). One area that has been overlooked is the comic book as a medium for highlighting social values, beliefs, and perceptions, particularly in regard to IPV and domestic violence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%