1996
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/4.3.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing Concurrent Actions and Solving Conflicts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, DRILL(part, dmtr, speed, x, y, z) represents the action of drilling a hole of a certain diameter, at a certain spindle speed, in a specific position of a given part. In the manufacturing domain, we are concerned with operations that may occur simultaneously [23,27,28,29], hence we adopt the concurrent, nontemporal variant of the Situation Calculus, where a concurrent or compound action a is a possibly infinite set of simple actions, like the one above, that execute simultaneously [23,Chapter 7]. For example, {ROTATE(part, speed), SPRAY(part, subst)} represents the joint execution of rotating a part at a given speed while spraying it with some substance.…”
Section: Situation Calculus and Congologmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DRILL(part, dmtr, speed, x, y, z) represents the action of drilling a hole of a certain diameter, at a certain spindle speed, in a specific position of a given part. In the manufacturing domain, we are concerned with operations that may occur simultaneously [23,27,28,29], hence we adopt the concurrent, nontemporal variant of the Situation Calculus, where a concurrent or compound action a is a possibly infinite set of simple actions, like the one above, that execute simultaneously [23,Chapter 7]. For example, {ROTATE(part, speed), SPRAY(part, subst)} represents the joint execution of rotating a part at a given speed while spraying it with some substance.…”
Section: Situation Calculus and Congologmentioning
confidence: 99%