2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing and Understanding the Carbon Cycle Using the Theory of Compartmental Dynamical Systems

Abstract: Models representing exchange of carbon between the atmosphere and the terrestrial biosphere include a large variety of processes and mechanisms, and have increased in complexity in the last decades. These models are no exception of the simulation versus understanding conundrum previously articulated for models of the physical climate, which states that increasing detail in process representation in models, and the simulations they produce, hinders understanding of holistic system behavior. However, recent theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is still disputable in how to represent τ , and most studies used mass/flux as an approximation, which may largely reflect the changes in turnover rate. To better represent τ , differences in turnover processes among various carbon pools (Lu et al., 2018; Sierra et al., 2018) should be considered. To our knowledge, there is no large‐scale observation based data to explicitly represent turnover processes of multiple pools and the carbon transit time is only possibly calculated by some process‐based models, some specific field experiments or with the help of stable isotopes (Lu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is still disputable in how to represent τ , and most studies used mass/flux as an approximation, which may largely reflect the changes in turnover rate. To better represent τ , differences in turnover processes among various carbon pools (Lu et al., 2018; Sierra et al., 2018) should be considered. To our knowledge, there is no large‐scale observation based data to explicitly represent turnover processes of multiple pools and the carbon transit time is only possibly calculated by some process‐based models, some specific field experiments or with the help of stable isotopes (Lu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ufalse(tfalse)double-struckR1×1 is the total system influx. It should be noted that this is a general linear nonautonomous system representation for dynamic carbon cycle processes, and vectors in the matrix equation are time dependent (Sierra, Ceballos‐Núñez, Metzler, & Müller, 2018). Furthermore, the matrix expression can be applied to the ecosystem, or separately for the vegetation or soil systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System age and transit time are closely related to the complexity of the ecosystem and its process rates, which are affected by the environment (Luo et al, 2017;Rasmussen et al, 2016;Sierra et al, 2017;Lu et al, 2018). Mean system ages of carbon are consistently greater than mean transit time (Lu et al, 2018;Sierra et al, 2018b), suggesting that once a mass of carbon enters an ecosystem a large proportion gets quickly released back to the atmosphere, but a small proportion remains for very long times. Furthermore, differences in transit times across ecosystems suggest that not all carbon sequestered in the terrestrial biosphere spends the same amount of time stored; e.g., one unit of photosynthesized carbon is returned back to the atmosphere faster in a tropical than in a boreal forest (Lu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%