2010
DOI: 10.1080/00220270903550849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing and practising meaningful differences in a well‐structured but complex art curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…323-343). Cunliffe (2010) showed that approaches to teaching the grammar of each gathering of art, and the related practices, are explored in a well-structured way by students using "know-how" and "know that" grammar. By conceptualizing and teaching an art curriculum in this way, students develop the insightful knowledge to understand how their life-world, as embedded in a technological understanding of being and its technological nihilism, compares with alternative understandings of being as articulated by different cultural grammars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…323-343). Cunliffe (2010) showed that approaches to teaching the grammar of each gathering of art, and the related practices, are explored in a well-structured way by students using "know-how" and "know that" grammar. By conceptualizing and teaching an art curriculum in this way, students develop the insightful knowledge to understand how their life-world, as embedded in a technological understanding of being and its technological nihilism, compares with alternative understandings of being as articulated by different cultural grammars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%