Representing and accessing multi-level annotations in MMAX2

Müller, Christoph

doi:10.3115/1621034.1621048

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Utilizing computation technology, transitivity process and participant detection possibly appears to utilize a specific algorithm covered in a software called UAM Corpus Tool. This software is designed to support linguists in working on corpus-based research (Müller & Strube, 2006). It serves automatic detection for some linguistic features, such as part of speech and Hallidayan functional linguistics.…”

Section: Transitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Humorous Discourse on the Middle East: Attitude Towards Representation

Novaldy,

Azizah

2023

ejlutama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Western perspective dominantly sees the Middle East in negative stereotypes. Many ways from many backgrounds start to criticize this perspective, including comedians utilizing comedy narration. This research aims at discovering how comedian represents Middle East and how the response manifests commenter’s attitude, applying descriptive qualitative research as a logical consequence that the data are in forms of stand-up performance transcription uploaded to YouTube and its sample comments from its comment column. Process of identifying Middle East representation and commenter’s attitude respectively utilizes Halliday’s transitivity and Martin & White’s appraisal system narrowed to attitude subsystem. The research results conclusions as follow. First, in terms of representation, the comedy narration provides an alternative platform to positively represent the Middle East, while second, commenter’s responses in attitude perspective mostly support the positive representation by showing their positive affection within themselves, favorable judgment in entity perspective, and affirmative appreciation to the happening event. This research attempt to see stimulated attitude after a representation in a specific social issue appears, while other researches documented in this writing integrate both theories at the same hierarchy. The relation varies in perspective of the audience stimulated by the discourse and who affirmatively experienced the discourse. At this point, comedy may have potency as a platform to pleasantly criticize sensitive issues

show abstract

Section: Transitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Humorous Discourse on the Middle East: Attitude Towards Representation

Novaldy,

Azizah

2023

ejlutama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, annotating coreference relations are frequently done (simultaneously with detecting entity mentions) as drawing chains of coreferences across different parts of a document. Thus, annotators are required to look at the entire document all the time jumping top to bottom, and use pointer devices to precisely dragand-draw links that often graphically rendered as lines/arrows (Müller and Strube, 2006;Widlöcher and Mathet, 2012) or color-coded bag-of-mentions (Oberle, 2018;Reiter, 2018;Aralikatte and Søgaard, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proceedings of The Sixth Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC 2023)

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the sixth edition of the Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC). CRAC was first held in New Orleans five years ago in conjunction with NAACL HLT 2018. But the workshop series dates back to its predecessor, the Coreference Resolution Beyond OntoNotes (CORBON) that started in 2016, and has arguably become the primary forum for coreference researchers to present their latest results since the demise of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium series in 2011. While CORBON focused on under-investigated coreference phenomena, CRAC has a broader scope, covering all cases of computational modeling of reference, anaphora, and coreference.CRAC 2023 continued to attract a large number of very high quality papers. Specifically, we received 15 submissions which were rigorously reviewed by three program committee members. Based on their recommendations, we accepted 10 papers. Two papers were withdrawn. This is the first time we are experimenting with the presentation of a non-archived work in progress. The idea is to allow authors to submit their work in progress for review. If it gets accepted, they can present the work at the workshop. However, it won't be included in the workshop proceedings. Thus, they can still submit a more complete version as original work to another venue. Overall, we were pleased with the large number of submissions as well as the quality of the accepted papers. This is the second year of the CRAC shared task on Multilingual Coreference Resolution. This allows researchers who did not participate in the workshop to disseminate their work to a smaller and more focused audience which should promote interesting discussions.We are grateful to the following people, without whom we could not have assembled an interesting program for the workshop. First, we are indebted to our program committee members. This year the reviewing load was on an average of three papers per reviewer. All of them did the incredible job of completing their reviews in a short reviewing period. This year we have two invited talks. We thank Bernd Bohnet and Milan Straka for accepting our invitation to be this year's invited speakers. We continue the tradition of having a panel on the Universal Anaphora (UA) effort-a unified, language-independent markup scheme that reflects common cross-linguistic understanding of reference-related phenomena. Motivated by Universal Dependencies, UA aims to facilitate referential analysis of the similarities and idiosyncrasies among typologically different languages, support comparative evaluation of anaphora resolution systems and enable comparative linguistic studies. Finally, we would like to thank the workshop participants for joining us in this event.We hope you will enjoy it as much as we do! -

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Annotation of Event Structure, Object States, and Entity Coreference

Rim,

Pustejovsky

2023

Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC 2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding coreference and anaphora is still considered as a hard problem for NLP applications. Recent studies on modeling and annotating coreference and/or anaphoric relations show that the problem is a hard problem even for human expert annotators. In this work, we demonstrate an annotation environment that enables quick and easy, but still flexible annotation of coreference relations based on event semantics and argument structure, and constraints arsing from temporal logic. The main focus of the environment is to integrate annotation of lexically anchored entity state change tracking and coreference chains along the event-based entity transformation. The scheme and environment is developed as open source, and is publicly available.

show abstract

Representing and accessing multi-level annotations in MMAX2

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Humorous Discourse on the Middle East: Attitude Towards Representation

Humorous Discourse on the Middle East: Attitude Towards Representation

Proceedings of The Sixth Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC 2023)

Integrated Annotation of Event Structure, Object States, and Entity Coreference

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About