2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10347-012-0334-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representatives of the genus Triploporella (Dasycladales, calcareous algae) in the Lower Cretaceous limestones of Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation, it is difficult to justify attribution of a species to Dragastanella n. gen. or Triploporella. For example, Triploporella carpatica Bucur, 1993(Bucur et al, 2013 resembles Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., but mineralization stops before the ; D, outer diameter; l, length of the primary lateral; p iw , whorl width of the first tract of the primary lateral; p w , whorl width of the primary lateral (maximum diameter); h, height between whorls; w, number of laterals in a whorl; cystophore Eq., equatorial diameter of the cystophores; cystophore Ax, axial diameter of the cystophores; cyst diameter, axial diameter of cysts.…”
Section: Journal Of Paleontology:1-17mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this situation, it is difficult to justify attribution of a species to Dragastanella n. gen. or Triploporella. For example, Triploporella carpatica Bucur, 1993(Bucur et al, 2013 resembles Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., but mineralization stops before the ; D, outer diameter; l, length of the primary lateral; p iw , whorl width of the first tract of the primary lateral; p w , whorl width of the primary lateral (maximum diameter); h, height between whorls; w, number of laterals in a whorl; cystophore Eq., equatorial diameter of the cystophores; cystophore Ax, axial diameter of the cystophores; cyst diameter, axial diameter of cysts.…”
Section: Journal Of Paleontology:1-17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, it is difficult to justify attribution of a species to Dragastanella n. gen. or Triploporella . For example, Triploporella carpatica Bucur, 1993 (Bucur et al, 2013) resembles Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., but mineralization stops before the distal end of the primary laterals (Fig.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fossil Family Triploporellaceae (Pia, 1920) groups euspondyl Dasycladalean algae with either endosporate (cysts were located in the main axis of these ancestral forms) or cladosporate (cysts or cyst‐containers were located in the primary laterals of these advanced forms) reproductive features, according to the revised classification of Granier and Bucur (in Granier et al, ). Triploporella Steinmann, , with some ten species spanning the Late Jurassic to the Paleocene interval (Deloffre & Granier, ; Granier & Deloffre, ) but with an acme in the late Early Cretaceous (Barremian–Aptian) times (Bucur et al, ; Granier & Deloffre, ), and Salpingoporella (Pia, ) with some thirty species (Carras, Conrad, & Radoičić, ; Granier & Deloffre, ) represent the most prolific genera among the Family Triploporellaceae. The type species of Triploporella Steinmann, , is T. fraasi Steinmann, .…”
Section: Preliminary Remarks On the Triploporellaceae (Pia )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triploporella Steinmann, 1880, with some ten species spanning the Late Jurassic to the Paleocene interval (Deloffre & Granier, 1992;Granier & Deloffre, 1993) but with an acme in the late Early Cretaceous (Barremian-Aptian) times (Bucur et al, 2013;Granier & Deloffre, 1993), and Salpingoporella (Pia, 1917) with some thirty species (Carras, Conrad, & Radoičić, 2006;Granier & Deloffre, 1993)…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representatives of the genus Triploporella from Lower Cretaceous rocks in Romania were studied by Bucur et al (2013). The authors used this opportunity to review some species previously assigned by various authors to Triploporella; according to the current results, they should be either affiliated to other genera through new combinations, or excluded from the genus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%