2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07046-9_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representative Encodings to Translate Finite CSPs into SAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further proposed encodings for the AtMost-1 constraint are the log encoding [33], the ladder encoding [18,17] also defined independently in [3], the commander encoding [23], generalizations of the log encoding and the two-product encoding [14], the bimander encoding [20], as well as generalizations of the bimander encoding [7].…”
Section: Short Review Of Known Encodingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further proposed encodings for the AtMost-1 constraint are the log encoding [33], the ladder encoding [18,17] also defined independently in [3], the commander encoding [23], generalizations of the log encoding and the two-product encoding [14], the bimander encoding [20], as well as generalizations of the bimander encoding [7].…”
Section: Short Review Of Known Encodingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Barahona et al have introduced two SAT-encoded CSPs [13]: the representative-sparse and representative-order encoding (we say the representative encodings). The representative encodings aim at not only taking advantage of the sparse and order encodings but also requiring a significantly smaller number of SAT variables.…”
Section: The Representative Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is only one approach for SAT to deal with this constraint by posing the at-leastone (ALO) and at-most-one (AMO) clauses (see [33,11,34]). In fact, the state-of-the-art SAT solvers need more than one hour for tackling the pigeon-hole problem with only 16 holes [49,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a lot of work proposing different techniques for encoding a CSP into a SAT problem [4,104,18,178,174]. A hybrid approach, called Lazy Clause Generation, is instead presented in [149].…”
Section: Nogood Learning and Lazy Clause Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more detail, mzn2feat-1.0 extracts in total 95 features. The variables (27), domains (18), constraints (27), and solving (11) features are exactly the same of mzn2feat (see Table 4 Finally, we compared sunny-tps vs. the following approaches:…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%