1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02573128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations of the Banach algebra ℓ1(S)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition.A representation n of a monoid S on a Hilbert space H will be called formally real is there is an orthonormal basis {e,|ie/} of H for which (n(x)e s \e r } is real for all x6S and all r,sel.It is known that if the *-representations of S are separating then the Banach *-algebra <f'(s) is *-semisimple. This follows from Theorem 3.4 of [1] (a direct proof may be found R. G. MCLEAN in[3]). The following lemma shows that under suitable conditions a separating set of representations of S gives rise to a separating set of representations of £ l (S).Lemma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Definition.A representation n of a monoid S on a Hilbert space H will be called formally real is there is an orthonormal basis {e,|ie/} of H for which (n(x)e s \e r } is real for all x6S and all r,sel.It is known that if the *-representations of S are separating then the Banach *-algebra <f'(s) is *-semisimple. This follows from Theorem 3.4 of [1] (a direct proof may be found R. G. MCLEAN in[3]). The following lemma shows that under suitable conditions a separating set of representations of S gives rise to a separating set of representations of £ l (S).Lemma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Then si is a self-conjugate unital subalgebra of /"(S) which separates points of S so by Theorem 1 of [3], if / is a non-zero element of ^1(S), then there is a ge si with xeS It follows that there is a ne0l with 7i(/)#0.…”
Section: Proof Let Si Be the Set Of All Functions / : S->f Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of these is by MCLEAN and KUMMER [43] and contains a completely different proof of Theorem 3.3 (see Section 3) for the case in which S is a discrete semigroup. For a commutative semigroup 5 it is quite easy to determine the complex homomorphisms of the algebra l l (S).…”
Section: The Algebra L L (S)mentioning
confidence: 97%