2010
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9028.v4i3p399-423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations of quivers on abelian categories and monads on projective varieties

Abstract: Abstract. We consider representations of quivers in arbitrary categories and twisted representations of quivers in arbitrary tensor categories. We show that if A is an abelian category, then the category of representations of a quiver in A is also abelian, and that the category of twisted linear representations of a quiver is equivalent to the category of linear (untwisted) representations of a different quiver. We conclude by discussing how representations of quivers arise naturally in certain important probl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We construct an equivalence functor F between C and Q which restricts to the desired equivalences between their subcategories. Similar partial results in this direction were obtained in [12] and [13].…”
Section: Equivalence Between Categories Of Monads and Representationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We construct an equivalence functor F between C and Q which restricts to the desired equivalences between their subcategories. Similar partial results in this direction were obtained in [12] and [13].…”
Section: Equivalence Between Categories Of Monads and Representationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We construct an equivalence functor F between C and Q which restricts to the desired equivalences between their subcategories. Similar partial results in this direction were obtained in [8,9]. First, fix homogeneous coordinates [x 0 : x 1 : x 2 : x 3 ] of P 3 , and let {x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 } be the corresponding basis of H 0 (O P 3 (1)); one has a natural isomorphism…”
Section: Proposition 6 There Is An Equivalence Of Categories Betweensupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A functor X ∈ G(H) associates an object X (i) ∈ H to each node i ∈ G and a morphism X (ψ) ∈ Hom H X (i), X (j)(7.4) to each arrow i ψ − → j of G. G(H) is a linear Abelian category of global dimension at most 2, and all auto-equivalence σ of H induce an auto-equivalence 1 ⊗ σ of G(H)[79] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%