1974
DOI: 10.1016/0001-8708(74)90069-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations of division algebras over local fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, we show that the Moy-Prasad filtrations and the mock exponential maps are compatible with restriction to such subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…9, we show that the Moy-Prasad filtrations and the mock exponential maps are compatible with restriction to such subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is difficult to associate certain characters with any particular torus, as well as to tell when representations constructed from different tori are distinct. We also mention the work of Corwin on division algebras in both the tame [14] and the wild [15] case.…”
Section: The P-adic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Proposition 1.5 of [4], we may conclude that H\U)@H\U) and H θ \U)ζ&H θ "{U) are both G-invariant. (See also Lemma 4.1 of [3].) 5* From [5] and [7], we know that all supercuspidal representations of G are induced from some compact open subgroup.…”
Section: T(dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The object of this paper is to show just how these representations correspond to summands of quadratic extension Weil representations. The methods depend heavily on [3]. The primary motivation for this paper was the problem of decomposing tensor products of certain supercuspidal representations of G. The authors have been told that some similar computations have been worked out by J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation