Representations of cycling in metropolitan newspapers - changes over time and differences between Sydney and Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

BackgroundCycling is important for health, transport, environmental and economic reasons. Newspaper reporting of cycling reflects and can influence public and policy maker attitudes towards resource allocation for cycling and cycling infrastructure, yet such coverage has not been systematically examined.MethodsThe Factiva electronic news archive was searched for articles referring to cycling published in four major metropolitan newspapers - two in Sydney and two in Melbourne, Australia, in the years from 1998 until 2008. After excluding articles not about cycling, there were 61 articles published in 1998, 45 in 1999, 51 in 2003, 82 in 2007 and 87 in 2008. Each article was coded for positive or negative orientation, and for framing of cyclists and cycling. Inter-rater reliability was calculated on a sample of 30 articles.ResultsOver the past decade there has been an increase in the reporting of cycling in the major newspapers in Sydney and Melbourne (from 106 in 1998/99 to 169 stories in 2007/08), with a significant increase in reporting of cycling in Melbourne, from 49 to 103 stories (p = 0.04). Recent reporting of cycling was generally positive (47% of articles, compared with 30% of articles which were negative) and focused on benefits such as health and the environment. Three quarters of negative stories involved injury or death of a cyclist. The Sydney based The Daily Telegraph reported the most negative stories (n = 60). We found positive framing of 'cycling' was more widespread than negative, whereas framing of 'cyclists' was more negative than positive.ConclusionsQuantity of reporting of cycling varies over time and by newspaper, and even between newspapers in different cities owned by the same media company. News coverage appears to reflect developments in the different cities, with increases in positive reporting of cycling in Melbourne following increases in cycling in that city. Negative cycling newspaper stories may deter people from considering cycling as a transport option, but real physical or political improvements to the cycling environment may be necessary before coverage becomes more positive.

Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling?

“…Krizek et al (2006) argue that greater risk aversion among women would lead to lower adoption. Attributes associated with cycling in low-cycling contexts, such as risk tolerance and sportiness Horton, 2007;Rissel, Bonfiglioli, Emilsen, & Smith, 2010) may be disproportionately off-putting for women. Out-group stereotypes and experiences of marginalisation can be mutually reinforcing, acting to further exclude under-represented groups (Aldred, 2013;Steinbach et al, 2011).…”

“…First, older adults may also be put off the image of cycling as being for "sporty" individuals (Rissel et al, 2010). Second, studies examining cycling preference and choices by age indicate that older adults may have stronger preferences for segregation from motor traffic.…”

‘In Our Country it's Just Poor People who Ride a Bike’: Place, Displacement and Cycling in Australia

“…Melbourne enjoys a climate and topography suited to cycling (Nankervis, 1999; Pucher, Garrard, & Greaves, ) and, with a reduction in cycling injury rates despite an increase in number of cyclists between 2006 and 2011, is also considered physically safe to ride bicycles (Pucher et al, ). Cycling has a positive image including being positively represented by the Melbourne media (Rissel, Bonfiglioli, Emilsen, & Smith, ). Melbourne's local governments and associated councils invested in cycling infrastructures within their business districts and inner suburbs through the development of bicycle lanes, paths with bicycle signage and bicycle parking (ABS, ; Mees, O'Connell, & Stone, ; Pucher et al, ).…”

The reciprocal relationship between policy debate and media coverage: The case of road pricing policy in the Netherlands

“…In addition, some studies in the area of transport policy (e.g. Rissel et al, 2010;Nygrén et al, 2012;Judge, 2002) have explored the media coverage of transport policy issues. However, only three of these latter studies focused on road pricing policy.…”