2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4990503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representations in neural network based empirical potentials

Abstract: Many structural and mechanical properties of crystals, glasses, and biological macromolecules can be modeled from the local interactions between atoms. These interactions ultimately derive from the quantum nature of electrons, which can be prohibitively expensive to simulate. Machine learning has the potential to revolutionize materials modeling due to its ability to efficiently approximate complex functions. For example, neural networks can be trained to reproduce results of density functional theory calculat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a direct comparison between the present model and potentials obtained with the conventional ANN method 11,12 , we constructed two different Li-Si potentials one with the INN method and the other with the ANN method. Since the SNN method relies on the ANN approach for the construction of pure element NNs, it is subject to the same limitations as ANN at the level of pure-element network construction.…”
Section: Model Construction and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a direct comparison between the present model and potentials obtained with the conventional ANN method 11,12 , we constructed two different Li-Si potentials one with the INN method and the other with the ANN method. Since the SNN method relies on the ANN approach for the construction of pure element NNs, it is subject to the same limitations as ANN at the level of pure-element network construction.…”
Section: Model Construction and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the descriptor selection from physical considerations has been observed for a diverse set of materials science applications; [1][2][3][4][5][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] however, it is not always possible to find the relevant physical descriptors for the desired application. Furthermore, even if physical descriptors have been identified, they are not always easily accessible.…”
Section: Article Scitationorg/journal/jcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most exciting and challenging aspects of structure–property (e.g., ML) model development is that these three quantities are coupled and ever changing (Figure ). Large data sets increase the benefit of more complex models, and a less tailored representation will benefit from models such as ANNs that essentially carry out feature engineering of the representation . An individual researcher's answers to the questions I posed largely shape what the right balance is in choosing one of many possible trade‐offs in data, model, and representation (Figure ).…”
Section: The Data Model and Representation Trade‐offmentioning
confidence: 99%