2008
DOI: 10.4171/rsmup/119-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Représentations Cristallines et $F$-Cristaux: le Cas d'un Corps Résiduel Imparfait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 4.6. Analogous statements hold when T is a crystalline G R -representation with Hodge-Tate weights in [0, r] for the case er < p − 1, since [BT08] constructs more generally a functor from crystalline representations with Hodge-Tate weights in [0, r] to Kisin modules of height r when the base is a complete discrete valuation field whose residue field has a finite p-basis.…”
Section: Construction Of Kisin Modulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 4.6. Analogous statements hold when T is a crystalline G R -representation with Hodge-Tate weights in [0, r] for the case er < p − 1, since [BT08] constructs more generally a functor from crystalline representations with Hodge-Tate weights in [0, r] to Kisin modules of height r when the base is a complete discrete valuation field whose residue field has a finite p-basis.…”
Section: Construction Of Kisin Modulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…is an example of a complete discrete valuation field with a residue field having a finite p-basis, studied in [BT08]. On the other hand, for each maximal ideal q ∈ mSpecR 0 , let R 0,q be the q-adic completion of R 0,q .…”
Section: Base Ring and Crystalline Period Ring In The Relative Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1 was first proved by Breuil [Bre00] and all the remaining statements were proved by Kisin [Kis06]. Brinon and Trihan [BT08] generalised the results of Kisin [Kis06] and Faltings [Fal99,§6] to p-divisible groups over a p-adic discrete valuation ring with imperfect residue field admitting finite p-basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We then prove Proposition 2 by generalising [CL09, §2.2]. This allows us to avoid the rigid analytic construction (cf., [Kis06,§1] and [BT08,§4]), which is hard to generalise to the relative setting. To prove Theorem 5, we generalise the strategy of [Kis06,§2.3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%