2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representational similarity analysis reveals atypical age-related changes in brain regions supporting face and car recognition in autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we hypothesized, the current study replicated the well-documented findings that children with ASD have general face memory deficits [22,61,62], and further affirmed that deficits are present both in the encoding and retrieval phases. In the behavioral aspect, Gaigg et al [25] found that children with ASD present a lower accuracy than NTC in a three-order load paradigm of memory encoding, while Cooper et al [27] found that they made more errors in a continuous memory recalling task.…”
Section: Transdiagnostic Features Of Face Memory In Children With Asd and Adhdsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As we hypothesized, the current study replicated the well-documented findings that children with ASD have general face memory deficits [22,61,62], and further affirmed that deficits are present both in the encoding and retrieval phases. In the behavioral aspect, Gaigg et al [25] found that children with ASD present a lower accuracy than NTC in a three-order load paradigm of memory encoding, while Cooper et al [27] found that they made more errors in a continuous memory recalling task.…”
Section: Transdiagnostic Features Of Face Memory In Children With Asd and Adhdsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, it does not explain the technological impact on obesity. [29] Focusing on autism associated with unusual activation during face processing representational similarity analysis…”
Section: Quasi-experimental Pragmatic Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While age-related differences in representational properties are a relatively longstanding topic in neurocognitive aging research – in particular the hypothesis and evidence regarding neural dedifferentiation ( Carp et al, 2011 , Kobelt et al, 2021 , Koen and Rugg, 2019 , Li et al, 2001 , Li et al, 2000 , Park et al, 2004 , Park et al, 2010 ) – childhood development has only recently been investigated from a representational perspective, and mainly with fMRI so far (cf. Cohen et al, 2019 ; Fandakova et al, 2019 ; O’Hearn et al, 2020 ). Accordingly, RSA is not yet a commonly utilized approach in developmental cognitive neuroscience, especially not for M/EEG studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%