2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representational momentum in older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age-related changes in integration of motion signals may contribute to the reduced effect of transient occlusion on the bouncing/streaming percept in older subjects. It is interesting to note that older adults also show weaker representational momentum for motion (Piotrowski and Jakobson, 2011), a phenomenon that may be related to the effects observed here. More broadly, age-related differences in internal noise and calculation efficiency of motion detectors may affect both intra- and inter-modal effects (Bennett et al, 1999, 2007; Betts et al, 2007; Casco et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Age-related changes in integration of motion signals may contribute to the reduced effect of transient occlusion on the bouncing/streaming percept in older subjects. It is interesting to note that older adults also show weaker representational momentum for motion (Piotrowski and Jakobson, 2011), a phenomenon that may be related to the effects observed here. More broadly, age-related differences in internal noise and calculation efficiency of motion detectors may affect both intra- and inter-modal effects (Bennett et al, 1999, 2007; Betts et al, 2007; Casco et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The sample size calculation was performed using G*power 3.1 (Faul et al, 2007). According to Piotrowski and Jakobson (2011), implicit RM is larger in younger adults than in older adults, with an effect size of d = 0.69 ( f = 0.345). Considering the differences in the paradigms used, the present study used a more conservative effect size of d = 0.5 ( f = 0.25) as a reference for the a priori analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no distortion in the motion extrapolation of older drivers. In addition, another study explored the RM effect in 14 young people and 14 older people (age > 65 years) using the classic implied motion paradigm (Piotrowski & Jakobson, 2011). In their experiment, three rectangles with different orientations were presented sequentially, leading to an implicit clockwise rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that observers tend to perceptually “see” the vanishing point of a moving object at a future location that the moving object would reach. Thus far, many studies have comprehensively examined the nature of RM, providing evidence for various aspects of its perceptual and cognitive characteristics such as stimulus velocity ( Finke et al, 1986 ; Getzmann and Lewald, 2009 ; Feinkohl et al, 2014 ; Merz et al, 2019 ), eye movements ( Kerzel, 2000 ), attention ( Hayes and Freyd, 2002 ; Kerzel, 2003 ; Hubbard et al, 2009 ), development ( Hubbard et al, 1999 ; Perry et al, 2008 ; Shirai et al, 2018 ; Mori et al, 2022 ), and aging aspects ( Piotrowski and Jakobson, 2011 ). Previous studies on RM generally provided evidence for forward displacement in the perceptual or memory representations of a moving object (see Hubbard, 2005 , 2014 , 2015 , for reviews).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%