The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01070.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of individual forelimb muscles in primary motor cortex

Abstract: Stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of forelimb muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity was used to investigate individual forelimb muscle representation within the primary motor cortex (M1) of rhesus macaques with the objective of determining the extent of intra-areal somatotopic organization. Two monkeys were trained to perform a reach-to-grasp task requiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was simultaneously recorded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist, 5 di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we cannot accurately reconstruct forces and muscle activations from kinematics, we cannot directly test this hypothesis. However, the activity of single neurons in the motor cortex has been shown to drive facilitation and suppression of several muscles (Buys et al, 1986;Griffin et al, 2015;Hudson et al, 2017), consistent with our finding that M1 RFs are large. How forces are encoded in the proprioceptive SCx and how these force signals interact with kinematic ones is largely unknown.…”
Section: Alternate Coordinate Frames Fail To Account Succinctly For Lsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Because we cannot accurately reconstruct forces and muscle activations from kinematics, we cannot directly test this hypothesis. However, the activity of single neurons in the motor cortex has been shown to drive facilitation and suppression of several muscles (Buys et al, 1986;Griffin et al, 2015;Hudson et al, 2017), consistent with our finding that M1 RFs are large. How forces are encoded in the proprioceptive SCx and how these force signals interact with kinematic ones is largely unknown.…”
Section: Alternate Coordinate Frames Fail To Account Succinctly For Lsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This would indicate LPMCd CSP proliferation may occur in spinal subsectors mediating proximal limb recovery (e.g., bilaterally in medial lamina VII and lamina VIII). In this regard, a spared LPMCd CSP appears to be in a favorable position to contribute to recovery of postural stabilization and reaching, particularly following compromise of the shoulder/trunk representation of M1 which lies caudal to LPMCd, and directly dorsal to the M1 arm/hand area (Figure a, see area outlined by the dashed red line) (Boudrias et al, ; Darling et al, , ; Hudson, Park, Belhaj‐Saif, & Cheney, ; Kwan, Mackay, Murphy, & Wong, ,b; Weinrich & Wise, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, careful use of single-pulse ICMS by Cheney et al . has been important in determining the complex maps of muscle outputs in primary 27 , 28 and secondary 29 , 30 motor areas. These studies have helped to demonstrate the direct, short-latency influence of M1 over forelimb muscles, compared with slower effects evoked from secondary motor areas.…”
Section: Functional Relationship Between Cortico-motoneuronal Cell Acmentioning
confidence: 99%