Automata Studies. (AM-34) 1956
DOI: 10.1515/9781400882618-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
603
0
12

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,031 publications
(654 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
603
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This was proved for the axiomatization of Section 16.4 in Kozen (1991aKozen ( , 1994a, but the idea essentially goes back to Kleene (1956); Conway (1971); Backhouse (1975). This result gives rise to an algebraic treatment of finite automata in which the automata are represented by their transition matrices.…”
Section: Kleene Algebramentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was proved for the axiomatization of Section 16.4 in Kozen (1991aKozen ( , 1994a, but the idea essentially goes back to Kleene (1956); Conway (1971); Backhouse (1975). This result gives rise to an algebraic treatment of finite automata in which the automata are represented by their transition matrices.…”
Section: Kleene Algebramentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is named for S. C. Kleene (1909Kleene ( -1994, who among his many other achievements invented regular expressions and proved their equivalence to finite automata in Kleene (1956).…”
Section: Kleene Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basic transmitting unit in the nervous system is brain cells, so called neurons [3], [6]. The neuron is not one homogeneous integrative unit but is (potentially) divided in many sub-integrative units, each one with the ability of mediating a local synaptic output to another cell or a local electro-tonic output to another part of the same cell.…”
Section: Biological Neural Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%