1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:11(1327)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Cross-Section Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be accomplished in several ways. One option models section behavior through multiple surfaces and flow rules defined in stress-resultant space (Hajjar and Gourley 1996;El-Tawil and Deierlein 2001). For example, elastic response is maintained if the loading point remains within the loading surface.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be accomplished in several ways. One option models section behavior through multiple surfaces and flow rules defined in stress-resultant space (Hajjar and Gourley 1996;El-Tawil and Deierlein 2001). For example, elastic response is maintained if the loading point remains within the loading surface.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete creep and shrinkage are ignored. As stated by Hajjar and Gourley (1996), concrete-filled steel tubes rarely exhibit flexural-torsional or lateraltorsional buckling, these failure modes are thus not considered.…”
Section: Moment-curvature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fiber element method is an accurate numerical technique for determining the crosssection behavior of steel-concrete composite columns [14,15,[23][24][25]. In the fiber element method, a circular CFSST column cross-section is discretized into fine fiber elements as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: The Fiber Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%