2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation and reasoning of context-dependant knowledge in distributed fuzzy ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, distributed ontology techniques [42][43][44] are presented and discussed in recent years. But they just focus on web ontology integration, mapping, and distributed reasoning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, distributed ontology techniques [42][43][44] are presented and discussed in recent years. But they just focus on web ontology integration, mapping, and distributed reasoning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the works [35][36][37][38], distributed ontology techniques are discussed. But, they just focus on mapping, integration, and reason of distributed ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, properties and semantics of ontology constructs mainly are determined by Description Logics (DLs) [35], a family of logics for representing structured knowledge which have proved to be very useful as ontology languages [42,38]. Formally, an ontology is a triple O = ⟨RB, T B, AB⟩, where RB (the Role Box or RBox) and T B (the Terminological Box or TBox) comprise the intensional knowledge, i.e., general knowledge about the world to be described (statements about roles and concepts, respectively), and AB (the Assertional Box or ABox) the extensional knowledge, i.e., particular knowledge about a specific instantiation of this world (statements about individuals in terms of concepts and roles) [42].…”
Section: Ontologies and Description Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, each parameter is only a word or a sentence, and expressive (or complex) parameters are not considered in soft sets [34]. In order to extend the expressive power of soft sets, Jiang et al [34] used the concepts of Description Logics (DLs) [35][36][37][38] to act as the parameters of soft sets. That is, an extended soft set theory based on DLs was presented in [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%