2020
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2021.1897660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation and meaning in rock art: the case of Algonquian rock images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a semiotic approach to the archaeological study of rock art is not new, Peircean perspectives are less widely used, and those implementing the concepts of qualisigns and qualia are rare (for examples, see Danielsson, 2015; Swenson, 2020). Yet, an approach centered on sensuous properties serves as a valuable complement to other materiality- and landscape-based approaches, particularly those highlighting the agency of rock art in creating social memory, reproducing institutional structures, and shaping modes of action and attention (e.g., Ambrosino, 2020; Rédei et al, 2019; Tapper et al, 2020). Recent research tends to emphasize the larger context of rock art in the construction of its meaning, particularly its relationship to landforms or features with cosmological significance, to aspects of the built environment, or to the dynamics of natural phenomena such as light and shadow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While a semiotic approach to the archaeological study of rock art is not new, Peircean perspectives are less widely used, and those implementing the concepts of qualisigns and qualia are rare (for examples, see Danielsson, 2015; Swenson, 2020). Yet, an approach centered on sensuous properties serves as a valuable complement to other materiality- and landscape-based approaches, particularly those highlighting the agency of rock art in creating social memory, reproducing institutional structures, and shaping modes of action and attention (e.g., Ambrosino, 2020; Rédei et al, 2019; Tapper et al, 2020). Recent research tends to emphasize the larger context of rock art in the construction of its meaning, particularly its relationship to landforms or features with cosmological significance, to aspects of the built environment, or to the dynamics of natural phenomena such as light and shadow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in his research on Andean rock art, Ambrosino (2020) uses a Peircean model to explore how the connections between ancestor veneration, identity, natural features, and movement relate to the negotiation of water rights. In another recent study, Tapper and colleagues (2020) highlight the fluid meanings of Algonquin rock art, which indexes reciprocal relationships between ‘humans, other-than-humans, animals, and places’ within changing semiotic ideologies. Although more archaeologists now recognize the usefulness of Peircean models in exploring the relational meanings of rock art, the concept of qualisigns is only rarely employed (see Danielsson, 2015; Rédei et al, 2019; Swenson, 2020).…”
Section: Semiotics and Qualia In Rock Art Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%