2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-007-2055-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representable semilattice-ordered monoids

Abstract: Abstract. We show that no finite set of first-order axioms can define the class of representable semilattice-ordered monoids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The class R( · , ; , 1 ) is not finitely axiomatizable, [15]. The same holds if we include 0 and/or a top element 1 (whose representation is a reflexive and transitive relation).…”
Section: Quasivarietiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The class R( · , ; , 1 ) is not finitely axiomatizable, [15]. The same holds if we include 0 and/or a top element 1 (whose representation is a reflexive and transitive relation).…”
Section: Quasivarietiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Andréka [An91] shows non-finite axiomatizability for representable algebras of similarity type τ ⊇ {• , +, ;}. In [HM07], we defined non-representable algebras of the similarity type {• , 1 , ;} whose ultraproduct is representable. Since 1 is a minimal non-zero element in these algebras, defining domain, range and antidomain operations should not be a problem.…”
Section: Any Non-trivial Ultraproductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subreduct that we focus on in this work is RRA(•, ∩, 1), the restriction of RRA to the operations of composition, intersection and the identity relation, also known as the class of representable semi-lattice ordered monoids. It was deeply studied in [2] and [8]. For example, its equational theory is decidable [1] but not finitely axiomatizable [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%