The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-39963-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repository Management in an Intelligent Indexing Approach for Multimedia Digital Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Search engine rankings have been adopted in most advanced intelligent libraries (Alexandrov et al 2003;Gutwin et al 1999;Hsinchun et al 1998;Kaklauskas et al 2006c;Ruch et al 2007;Trnkoczy et al 2006;Wang 2003) and tutoring systems (Armani et al 2010;Brusilovsky 2000;Day et al 2005;Lucence 2010;Pouliquen et al 2005). As part of the on-going Illinois Digital Library Initiative project, research proposes an intelligent personal spider (agent) approach to Internet searching, which is grounded on automatic textual analysis, general-purpose searches and genetic algorithms (Hsinchun et al 1998).…”
Section: Intelligent Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Search engine rankings have been adopted in most advanced intelligent libraries (Alexandrov et al 2003;Gutwin et al 1999;Hsinchun et al 1998;Kaklauskas et al 2006c;Ruch et al 2007;Trnkoczy et al 2006;Wang 2003) and tutoring systems (Armani et al 2010;Brusilovsky 2000;Day et al 2005;Lucence 2010;Pouliquen et al 2005). As part of the on-going Illinois Digital Library Initiative project, research proposes an intelligent personal spider (agent) approach to Internet searching, which is grounded on automatic textual analysis, general-purpose searches and genetic algorithms (Hsinchun et al 1998).…”
Section: Intelligent Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the ITA provides reading recommendations for students via a chapter similarity function. However, intelligent libraries (Alexandrov et al 2003;Gutwin et al 1999;Hsinchun et al 1998;Kaklauskas et al 2006c;Ruch et al 2007;Trnkoczy et al 2006;Wang 2003) and intelligent tutoring systems (Armani et al 2010;Brusilovsky and Peylo 2000;Day et al 2005;Lucence 2010;Pouliquen et al 2005) with search engine rankings cannot select chapters (sections, paragraphs) of specific texts, which are the most relevant to a student, cannot integrate the chapters (sections, paragraphs) of specific texts into learner specific alternatives of teaching material and cannot select the most rational alternative, i.e. cannot develop alternatives of training materials, perform multiple criteria analysis and automatically select the most effective variant.…”
Section: Intelligent Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search engine rankings have been adopted in the most advanced intelligent libraries (Alexandrov et al 2003;Chen, 2008Chen, , 2010García-Crespo et al 2010;Garibay et al 2010;Gutwin et al 1999;Hsinchun et al 1998;Hwang et al 2010;Kaklauskas et al 2006aKaklauskas et al , 2006bOard et al 2008;Ruch et al 2007;Trnkoczy et al 2006;Vega-Gorgojo et al 2010; and tutoring systems (Ammar et al 2010;Armani et al 2000;Brusilovsky, 2000;Chen, 2009;Chen, 2011;Day et al 2007;Gasparetti et al 2009;Gunel & Asliyan, 2010;He et al 2009;Hsu et al 2010;Lucence, 2005;Phobun & Vicheanpanya, 2010;Pouliquen et al 2005;Roll et al 2011;Sarrafzadeh et al 2008) recently. As part of the Illinois Digital Library Initiative project, the research proposes an intelligent personal spider (agent) approach to Internet searching, which is grounded on automatic textual analysis, generalpurpose search and genetic algorithms (Hsinchun et al 1998).…”
Section: Digital Libraries and Search Engine Rankingsmentioning
confidence: 99%