2014
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2013.872291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repositioning nystagmus: prognostic usefulness?

Abstract: The posterior semicircular canal (SCC) was affected in 84.2% of cases, the horizontal SCC in 10.5%, and the anterior SCC in 5.1%. Appropriate CRMs were performed. ON was present in 67% of cases. Overall resolution after the first treatment was achieved in 56% of cases. With ON present the success rate was 63% and when not observed the rate was 42%. DHI or CIEV scores were not significantly different when comparing the presence vs absence of ON. In nine patients (16%) an abnormal CIEV score was observed after t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40 The decision not to use Frenzel goggles or videonystagmography in our study was deliberate as we wished to reproduce the conditions faced by GPs in routine practice. Response to the EM in terms of perceived disability was not influenced by the presence or absence of nystagmus at baseline, supporting previous findings by Huebner et al 40 and Marques et al 42 Nonetheless, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that some of the patients in the S-BPPV group may have had vestibular neuritis or vestibular migraine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“… 40 The decision not to use Frenzel goggles or videonystagmography in our study was deliberate as we wished to reproduce the conditions faced by GPs in routine practice. Response to the EM in terms of perceived disability was not influenced by the presence or absence of nystagmus at baseline, supporting previous findings by Huebner et al 40 and Marques et al 42 Nonetheless, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that some of the patients in the S-BPPV group may have had vestibular neuritis or vestibular migraine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The decision not to use Frenzel goggles or videonystagmography in our study was deliberate as we wished to reproduce the conditions faced by GPs in routine practice. Response to the EM in terms of perceived disability was not in uenced by the presence or absence of nystagmus at baseline, supporting previous ndings by Huebner et al [39] and Marques et al [41]. Nonetheless, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that some of the patients in the S-BPPV group may have had vestibular neuritis or vestibular migraine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The decision not to use Frenzel goggles or videonystagmography in our study was deliberate as we wished to reproduce the conditions faced by GPs in routine practice. Response to the EM in terms of perceived disability was not in uenced by the presence or absence of nystagmus at baseline, supporting previous ndings by Huebner et al [40] and Marques et al [42]. Nonetheless, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that some of the patients in the S-BPPV group may have had vestibular neuritis or vestibular migraine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%