2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3018
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0

Abstract: Purpose: Defining a study population and creating an analytic dataset from longitudinal healthcare databases involves many decisions. Our objective was to catalogue scientific decisions underpinning study execution that should be reported to facilitate replication and enable assessment of validity of studies conducted in large healthcare databases. This article is a joint publication by Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety and Value in Health. Methods:This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, before pooling data through meta‐analysis (MA), validity remains a crucial aspect of study design and conception 25, 26, 27, 28. In particular, validation of the diagnoses is critical in the diabetes area, especially when in multinational epidemiological studies,29 because the lack of clinical data may compromise optimal algorithms for patients' and outcomes' identification.…”
Section: A Critical Appraisal Of Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, before pooling data through meta‐analysis (MA), validity remains a crucial aspect of study design and conception 25, 26, 27, 28. In particular, validation of the diagnoses is critical in the diabetes area, especially when in multinational epidemiological studies,29 because the lack of clinical data may compromise optimal algorithms for patients' and outcomes' identification.…”
Section: A Critical Appraisal Of Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as a distributed research network, IMeCCHI-DATANETWORK makes it possible to share research questions proposed by any of the partners, whereas the OECD network only allows its coordinating agency and expert groups to test new indicators at the international level. Finally, the IMeCCHI-DATANETWORK offers more transparency and replicability in research methods and data processing [21]. Indeed, metric specifications, code lists, classification use over time, linkage methods, risk-adjustment factors, statistical models applied, and the procedure itself are accessible to the research community and the public whereas OECD technical specifications are only accessible to data correspondents or expert groups [22].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Initiatives Of International Comparisomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases for this data were extracted from the NDB using diagnosis codes and procedure codes specific to fractures. The codes and algorithms used to extract data from the NDB are shown for transparency and reproducibility of the data [2]. The data contains all health insurance claims submitted in the area and is representative of the incidence of the population.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%