2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting sterilization as a current contraceptive method among sterilized women: lessons learned from a population with high sterilization rates, Rajasthan, India

Abstract: ObjectiveMeasuring current use of contraception relies on self-reported responses from survey respondents. Reporting validity may be affected by women's interpretation of the question and may vary by background characteristics of women. The study aims to understand levels and patterns of underreporting of female sterilization in a population with high sterilization rates.Study designData came from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey conducted in Rajasthan, India, in early 2017. In additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duration of breast feeding has also been found to be positively correlated with fertility. [3] result was similar and showed that 77% of sterilized women reported sterilization as a current contraceptive method. A study conducted by Nisha et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Duration of breast feeding has also been found to be positively correlated with fertility. [3] result was similar and showed that 77% of sterilized women reported sterilization as a current contraceptive method. A study conducted by Nisha et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Finally, the NFHS-3 was completed in 2006 and the prevalence of DV, contraceptive method use, or covariates may have changed. Notwithstanding, recent studies show that rates of DV (Dwivedi & Sachdeva, 2019; Ram et al, 2019) and female sterilization (Choi et al, 2019; N. C. Sharma, 2018) have been consistently high and have shown an upward trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the cross-sectional nature of the survey, causality cannot be inferred from the findings. There is also possibility of underreporting of FPC among some of the women due to its sensitivity [70]. The surveys included in the study were conducted at different time points.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%