1993
DOI: 10.1067/mva.1993.45889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting standards for lower extremity arterial endovascular procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These shortcomings in methodology and reporting make it difficult to compare results, and made us decide not to perform any meta-analysis. Therefore, we like to stress the importance of using standards for reporting results of treatment for peripheral arterial disease and, especially, for lower-extremity arterial endovascular procedures, to facilitate future meta-analyses [37, 38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shortcomings in methodology and reporting make it difficult to compare results, and made us decide not to perform any meta-analysis. Therefore, we like to stress the importance of using standards for reporting results of treatment for peripheral arterial disease and, especially, for lower-extremity arterial endovascular procedures, to facilitate future meta-analyses [37, 38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the patients had evidence of chronic limb ischaemia classified according to Rutherford. The patients’ demographic data, procedural and lesion-specific factors, outcomes and complications were defined according to the criteria prepared and revised by the Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients treated with balloon angioplasty of the iliac arteries as a primary therapeutic procedure were included; primary stent placement was performed. When either both the common iliac and external iliac arteries in one patient were treated or bilateral artery treatment was performed, each treated artery was counted separately, per Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards [17]; however, patient mortality was based only on patients treated. Exclusion criteria included patients with aneurysmal disease and patients who underwent hybrid treatments during the same procedure (e.g., a concomitant open procedure at the same setting), as well as patients who planned to undergo staged subsequent procedures, including revascularization distal to the iliac arteries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%