Reporting quantitative information in qualitative research: guidance for authors and reviewers

Neale, Joanne; Miller, Peter; West, Robert

doi:10.1111/add.12408

Cited by 110 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Family members are a key resource, especially when there are children who provide a motivation to regain stability and avoid substance misuse (c.f. Barker, 2012;Neale, Miller et al, 2014;Neale, Nettleton et al, 2014). Additionally, friends both within and outside the hostel setting can be important sources of support, particularly if they do not themselves have a problem with drink or drugs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Qualitative research is generally characterised by an absence of numbers (Neale, Miller, & West, 2014), but the use of the IPDA provided us with complementary quantitative data against which it was possible to triangulate the qualitative accounts and thence produce some simple numeric data on the number and type of core relationships in each participant's network. For this paper, no further quantitative analyses of the IPDA data were undertaken.…”

Section: Data Coding and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social and recovery capital amongst homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol

Neale

Stevenson

2015

International Journal of Drug Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol have various opportunities for building social capital that can in turn foster recovery capital. Therapies that focus on promoting positive social networks amongst people experiencing addiction seem to offer a valuable way of working with homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol. Gains are, however, likely to be maximised where hostel management and staff are supportive of, and actively engage with, therapy delivery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Coding and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Social and recovery capital amongst homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol

Neale

Stevenson

2015

International Journal of Drug Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We examined code frequency and relationships and compared these data with ART-AQ responses. Five categories of ART attitudes were chosen for final qualitative analysis based on estimated frequency of occurrence [46]. Exemplars were selected that illustrated the full range of participant attitudes influencing ART utilization.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Medication Attitudes on Utilization of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) in Indonesian Prisons

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Negative attitudes toward HIV medications may restrict utilization of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Indonesian prisons where many people living with HIV (PLH) are diagnosed and first offered ART. This mixed-method study examines the influence of medication attitudes on ART utilization among HIV-infected Indonesian prisoners. Randomly-selected HIV-infected male prisoners (n = 102) completed face-to-face in-depth interviews and structured surveys assessing ART attitudes. Results show that although half of participants utilized ART, a quarter of those meeting ART eligibility guidelines did not. Participants not utilizing ART endorsed greater concerns about ART efficacy, safety, and adverse effects, and more certainty that ART should be deferred in PLH who feel healthy. In multivariate analyses, ART utilization was independently associated with more positive ART attitudes (AOR = 1.09, 95 % CI 1.03–1.16, p = 0.002) and higher internalized HIV stigma (AOR = 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.07, p = 0.016). Social marketing of ART is needed to counteract negative ART attitudes that limit ART utilization among Indonesian prisoners.

show abstract

“…The proportions of different types of respondents varied both within and across the seven programs. For these reasons, we elected not to quantify the qualitative data (see [32]), and have attempted instead to identify predominant Scale used: 1 = to a very little extent, 2 (no label), 3 = to some extent, 4 (no label), 5 = to a very great extent.…”

Section: Content Analyses Of Sbirt Staff and Key Stakeholder Interviementioning

confidence: 99%

Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT): implementation barriers, facilitators and model migration

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To identify barriers and facilitators associated with initial implementation of a US alcohol and other substance use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) grant program, and to identify modifications in program design that addressed implementation challenges. Design A mixed-method approach used quantitative and qualitative data, including SBIRT provider ratings of implementation barriers and facilitators, staff interview responses and program documentation. Setting Multiple sites within the first seven programs funded in a national demonstration program in the United States. Participants One hundred and two SBIRT providers were surveyed; 221 SBIRT stakeholders and staff were interviewed. Measurements Mean ratings of barriers and facilitators were calculated using provider survey responses. An inductive content analysis of interview responses identified factors perceived to support and challenge implementation; program modifications that occurred over time were recorded. Findings Providers rated pre-selected implementation facilitators higher than barriers. Content analysis of interview responses revealed six themes: committed leaders; intra-and inter-organizational communication/collaboration; provider buy-in and model acceptance; contextual factors; quality assurance; and grant requirements. Over time, programs tended to: adopt more efficient 'pre-screen' item sets; screen for risk factors in addition to alcohol/substance use; use contracted specialists to deliver SBIRT services; conduct services in high-volume emergency department and trauma center settings; and implement on-site and telephonic treatment delivery. Conclusions Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment program implementation in the United States is facilitated by committed leadership and the use of substance use specialists, rather than medical generalists, to deliver services. Many implementation challenges can be addressed by an adequate start-up phase focused on comprehensive education and training, and on the development of intra-and inter-organizational communication and collaboration; opinion leader support; and practitioner and host site buy-in.

show abstract

Reporting quantitative information in qualitative research: guidance for authors and reviewers

Cited by 110 publications

References 6 publications

Social and recovery capital amongst homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol

Social and recovery capital amongst homeless hostel residents who use drugs and alcohol

The Influence of Medication Attitudes on Utilization of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) in Indonesian Prisons

Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT): implementation barriers, facilitators and model migration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About