2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103471
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in operative dentistry: An assessment using the PRISMA for Abstracts guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper applies the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to carry out the systematic literature review employed in this study, as represented in Figure 1 . This approach is a published guideline that facilitates a process-orientated flow for researchers to extensively evaluate and engage reviewed resources (Moher et al 2009 ) and has also been utilized by several researchers (Gong et al 2021 ; Kamaraj et al 2021 ; Li et al 2020 ; Sharma and Oremus 2018 ). The PRISMA approach requires four stages: (1) identification; (2) screening; (3) eligibility assessment; and (4) inclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper applies the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to carry out the systematic literature review employed in this study, as represented in Figure 1 . This approach is a published guideline that facilitates a process-orientated flow for researchers to extensively evaluate and engage reviewed resources (Moher et al 2009 ) and has also been utilized by several researchers (Gong et al 2021 ; Kamaraj et al 2021 ; Li et al 2020 ; Sharma and Oremus 2018 ). The PRISMA approach requires four stages: (1) identification; (2) screening; (3) eligibility assessment; and (4) inclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of this work is to present an overview of XAI applications in PHM of industrial assets by using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA, available online: www.prisma-statement.org, accessed on 4 October 2021) guidelines [43]. PRISMA is an evidence-based guideline that ensures comprehensiveness, reducing bias, increasing reliability, transparency, and clarity of the review with minimum items [44,45]. PRISMA is a 27-checklist guideline that needs to be satisfied as best as possible for the best practice in systematic review redaction.…”
Section: Review Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRISMA is an evidence-based checklist developed to act as a guideline for conducting systematic reviews (See Liberati et al 2009). The PRISMA framework is widely used in order to improve the clarity, transparency and completeness of systematic review reporting (Li et al 2020).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%