2018
DOI: 10.1177/1937586718772615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Implications for Health Design

Abstract: Qualitative research is expansive and occasionally controversial, spanning many different methods of inquiry and epistemological approaches. A "one-size-fits-all" standard for reporting qualitative research can be restrictive, but COREQ and SRQR both serve as valuable tools for developing responsible qualitative research proposals, effectively communicating research decisions, and evaluating submissions. Ultimately, tailoring a set of standards specific to health design research and its frequently used methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three steps included (1) literature review, (2) extracting concepts and main themes based on qualitative analysis, and (3) mapping concepts, and synthesizing the results with expert consultation. The qualitative synthesis was conducted based on the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, which can help researchers to report their results correctly 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three steps included (1) literature review, (2) extracting concepts and main themes based on qualitative analysis, and (3) mapping concepts, and synthesizing the results with expert consultation. The qualitative synthesis was conducted based on the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, which can help researchers to report their results correctly 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative synthesis was conducted based on the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist, which can help researchers to report their results correctly. 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was used to facilitate an explicit and comprehensive evaluation of study quality [23]. The COREQ comprises a checklist devised to identify opportunities for bias, is well suited for focus group or interview data collection methods and more sensitive than alternative quality assessment tools [24]. Two…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers deem the COREQ reductionist and proscriptive [91], while others maintain that it allows peer reviewers and journal editors to make systematic, informed decisions about manuscript quality [92]. Some journals (e.g., Journal of Public Health) and groups of journals (e.g., BMC) suggest or require that manuscript submissions follow COREQ reporting guidelines and may even ask authors to submit a completed checklist identifying where in the manuscript each item is addressed.…”
Section: Descriptive Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%