2011
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2011.2165863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting Order Control for Fast Primary Detection in Cooperative Spectrum Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the above works [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23] based on TDMA reporting, reference [24] applied quickest detection in spectrum sensing in CRNs when multiple SUs collaborate with limited communication time slots and proposed a threshold random broadcast scheme without an explicit coordination for the information exchange. A random access-based reporting order control scheme for cooperative sensing was proposed in [25] . By controlling the reporting order of local statistics, the global statistic at the fusion center accumulates faster than the case without order control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from the above works [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23] based on TDMA reporting, reference [24] applied quickest detection in spectrum sensing in CRNs when multiple SUs collaborate with limited communication time slots and proposed a threshold random broadcast scheme without an explicit coordination for the information exchange. A random access-based reporting order control scheme for cooperative sensing was proposed in [25] . By controlling the reporting order of local statistics, the global statistic at the fusion center accumulates faster than the case without order control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion center then makes a final soft or hard decision regarding the presence or absence of PUs [11,12] . The cooperative gains in spectrum sensing performance have been extensively demonstrated in existing works [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the presence of noises and fading of wireless channels, hidden terminals, obstacles, and so on, spectrum sensing of individual nodes cannot achieve high detection accuracies [6], [7]. In contrast, cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) exploits a parallel fusion sensing architecture in which independent secondary users (SUs) transmit their sensing data to a fusion center in different time slots based on a time division multiple access (TDMA) scheme [8]- [15] or a random access scheme [16], [17], due to the extremely limited bandwidth of the common control channel. 1 The fusion center then makes a final soft or hard decision regarding the presence or absence of PUs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The fusion center then makes a final soft or hard decision regarding the presence or absence of PUs. The cooperative gains in spectrum sensing performance have been extensively demonstrated in existing works [6]- [17]. However, the drawback of CSS schemes is that both the energy consumption and the reporting time grow linearly with the number of cooperative SUs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%