2011
DOI: 10.18848/1836-6236/cgp/v02i02/51249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting on Climate Change: An Australian Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Völker and Scholl [106], scientific reports are the best possible representation or description of reality; if the media's description of reality deviates too far from scientific description, it may be considered deficient, since any false, inaccurate or biased information will negatively influence people's decisions, with possibly far-reaching consequences. According to Debrett [107] (p. 149) "reporting on the topic of climate change and the findings of climate scientists raises specific difficulties for journalists, because of the disjuncture between scientific precision, and its language of 'probability and percentages, significant difference and estimation of error' and the media's hunger for an easily communicable truth". Young and Dugas's [108] review of the literature highlighted the difficulties of environmental news journalism; a limited number of journalists have formal education in natural sciences and even those who are so educated face the constant challenge of having to wade through masses of complex information that encompasses many disciplines and contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Völker and Scholl [106], scientific reports are the best possible representation or description of reality; if the media's description of reality deviates too far from scientific description, it may be considered deficient, since any false, inaccurate or biased information will negatively influence people's decisions, with possibly far-reaching consequences. According to Debrett [107] (p. 149) "reporting on the topic of climate change and the findings of climate scientists raises specific difficulties for journalists, because of the disjuncture between scientific precision, and its language of 'probability and percentages, significant difference and estimation of error' and the media's hunger for an easily communicable truth". Young and Dugas's [108] review of the literature highlighted the difficulties of environmental news journalism; a limited number of journalists have formal education in natural sciences and even those who are so educated face the constant challenge of having to wade through masses of complex information that encompasses many disciplines and contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadcast meteorologists face the challenge of inadequate time to prepare, insufficient high-quality content on which to base reports, and difficulty with accessing climate scientists for advisory services and interviews [92]. As expressed by Debrett [107], delivering climate change information is a problem for the media, as climate change information has a tendency to confound and demoralize readers, whom newspapers prefer not to alienate, but to retain. Furthermore, the scientific research cycle takes years and requires constant review and validation; this usually constrains the media as it has a cycle of, at most, 24 h; as a result, it shows a lack of aggression and willpower in reporting on environmental matters [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, has helped investors and capital markets around the globe to take increased action to support the mitigation of and adaptations to climate change risk through providing climate-related information disclosed in financial statements, thereby improving market resilience and achieving sustainable development with a minimized amount of carbon emissions. Towards such efforts, recent studies have documented climate reporting activities and issues in specific countries such as the United States (Bohr, 2020), the United Kingdom (Ruiu, 2021;Tang & Demeritt, 2018;Taylor & Nathan, 2002), Papua New Guinea (Pascoe et al, 2019), Australia (Debrett, 2011;Foxwell-Norton, 2017;Shea et al, 2020), Sweden (Berglez & Lidskog, 2019;Kleinschmit & Sjöstedt, 2014), Germany (Kaiser & Rhomberg, 2016), Greece (Tsalis & Nikolaou, 2017), China (Yang & Farley, 2016) and other emerging countries (Jeswani et al, 2008;Solomon et al, 2011). These studies indicate the importance and necessity of enhanced climate change risk reporting in mainstream financial statements and these studies ask for greater involvement of international accounting standard setting bodies (Deloitte, 2021;International Federation of Accountants [IFAC], 2021; PricewaterhouseCoopers [PWC], 2021).…”
Section: Scholars Have Conducted Research In Area Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The media need revenue to survive and environment stories rarely bring in revenue. This is understandable, given today's declining newsroom budget (Debrett, 2011). The editor of Nigeria's Guardian Newspaper, Martin Oloja, puts it this way:…”
Section: Analysis Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%