2011
DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.74300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting of the methodological quality and ethical aspects in clinical trials published in Indian journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] Except for very attempts that too with smaller samples for statistical reporting and methodological aspects of clinical trials, this issue is not adequately addressed for articles published in various Indian Medical Journals. [10][11][12] Present study aims to document use of various study designs and statistical methods used by authors in articles published in Indian Medical Journals. from these journals were analysed independently by fi rst and second author for study design and statistical methods (k = 0.85 for study design and 0.89 for statistical analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Except for very attempts that too with smaller samples for statistical reporting and methodological aspects of clinical trials, this issue is not adequately addressed for articles published in various Indian Medical Journals. [10][11][12] Present study aims to document use of various study designs and statistical methods used by authors in articles published in Indian Medical Journals. from these journals were analysed independently by fi rst and second author for study design and statistical methods (k = 0.85 for study design and 0.89 for statistical analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical approval by an independent or institutional review board and evidence of informed consent are considered to be important components of any research project (1). Studies in the Indian context have found that reporting of ethics of research in manuscripts is less than satisfactory, though this reporting has improved (1,2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor quality of published article may be because of either of two main reasons – one, study might not have been conducted properly, i.e., it may be poor methodologically, underpowered, use inappropriate statistics, etc., and second, all the parameters which can help authors to check validity of results are reported adequately in the published article. [15]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%