2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting of lipidomics data should be standardized

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation of the novel method demonstrated its suitability for large-scale studies despite the higher variations observed for some samples. These variations are related to inhomogeneity of samples and lipolytic activity that requires further investigations considering pre-analytical issues as an essential part of lipidomic workflows and their standardization [29,30,41]. Therefore, we recommend performing measurements in triplicate, when high accuracy is needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Validation of the novel method demonstrated its suitability for large-scale studies despite the higher variations observed for some samples. These variations are related to inhomogeneity of samples and lipolytic activity that requires further investigations considering pre-analytical issues as an essential part of lipidomic workflows and their standardization [29,30,41]. Therefore, we recommend performing measurements in triplicate, when high accuracy is needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an important next step within method development [29,30], we evaluated the performance of the FIA-FTMS method. Due to sample heterogeneity, intra-and inter-day precisions were evaluated in five different samples (Tables 2 and 3).…”
Section: Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other intriguing results have spurred interest in adopting lipidomics capabilities across research communities. A major challenge in the field of lipidomics, however, is the large disparity in methodologies and technologies, resulting in discrepancies in published data and broader issues of irreproducibility 8 . Common problems include improper annotation of lipid species (despite the publication of an accurate shorthand annotation for lipid species in 2013 9 ), misidentifications and overreporting, likely caused by incorrect mapping of mass spectral features to potential lipid molecules due to software errors combined with the a lack of manual data inspection or curation.…”
Section: Current State Of Lipidomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESI is commonly used in MS but is particularly sensitive to ion suppression and matrix effects. Therefore, coextraction of interferents, such as nonlipid biomolecules, leads to increased complexity of MS spectra, decreased sensitivity, and reduced lipid identification (2,6,7). The importance of sample preparation prior to lipidomic analysis is critical, as it can negatively influence the analytical measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this difficulty, alternative extraction methods have been developed using solvents such as methyl-tert-butyl ether (7) and butanol/methanol (15), in which the density of the organic layer is less then water, making it the upper phase (UP). These methods have been validated in a variety of sample matrices and with some lipid classes but may be limited with untested conditions for lipid species (6,16). If new matrices are used, methods must be revalidated regarding lipid class diversity, total lipid extraction, and reproducibility, and the results must be compared with the extraction efficiency of well-established methods such as the mBD and Folch methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%