Reporting of interventions used in anesthesiology trials: analysis using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist

Jellison, Samuel; Nolan, Johnny; Vo, Nam; Thai, Mark; Puljak, Livia; Vassar, Matt

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.004

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our analysis suggests that intervention reporting is quite variable in our sample of obesity trials. These results are consistent with previous research conducted in our lab in otolaryngology (12), anesthesiology (15), cardiothoracic surgery (29), and urology (30) in that we found suboptimal reporting in all fields regarding the expertise of the provider and fidelity assessment, making the determination of treatment integrity difficult. JaKa et al (31) found that 69% of obesity studies inadequately described the expertise of treatment providers.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals

Rauh

Turner

Jellison

et al. 2020

Obesity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) play a crucial role in the research and advancement of medical treatment. A cross-sectional study design was utilized to analyze the completeness of intervention reporting using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and to evaluate factors associated with intervention reporting. A comparison of the completeness of intervention reporting before and after the publication of TIDieR was sought. Methods: PubMed was searched for RCTs in the top 10 obesity journals per the Google h5-index. After excluding non-RCTs, 300 articles were randomly sampled. After assessing each publication for eligibility, two authors (SLR and DT) extracted data related to intervention reporting from records in an independent, masked fashion. Data were then verified and analyzed. Results: The analysis revealed that the quality of intervention reporting is quite variable. Overall, no statistically significant difference in the quality of intervention reporting before and after the release of TIDieR guidelines was found. In general, obesity research has good intervention reporting in areas such as the mode of delivery, material lists for intervention, and procedure lists. However, four main areas in which obesity researchers can improve reporting quality were determined. These include providing the expertise and background of intervention providers and providing statements regarding the assessment of fidelity of the intervention. Conclusions: Urgent intervention is warranted to improve the quality of research reporting in obesity research, which is a fundamental component of obesity management. This will likely require a unified approach from researchers, journals, and funding sources.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…This study was conducted in tandem with other studies that evaluated the completeness of intervention reporting across clinical specialties. Since these studies used a common methodology, these methods have also been described elsewhere (12)(13)(14)(15).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals

Rauh

Turner

Jellison

et al. 2020

Obesity

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, hospitals are interested in evaluating the quality of care in an increasingly more conscious cost-effectiveness environment. The lack of properly designed databases can lead to deficiencies in reporting trials and prospective studies in cardiothoracic surgery (81).…”

Section: Future Perspective and Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thoracic surgery in Egypt

Elkhayat¹,

Elsayed²,

Adel³

et al. 2022

J Thorac Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To implement and transfer effective interventions from single trials to daily clinical practice, a detailed description of the treatment should be provided by authors. Completeness of therapeutic interventions reporting is necessary for at least another two reasons 6 : to reproduce the intervention in subsequent trials and to provide sufficient information for evidence synthesis and comparison. All three mentioned reasons are important for the advancement of clinical knowledge and practice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Completeness of exercise reporting among randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review

Giagio

Innocenti

Salvioli

et al. 2021

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review aimed to assess the completeness of exercise reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINHAL, Embase, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases were searched up to October 2020. Full-text RCTs comparing PFMT to any type of intervention among women with any type and stage of POP were eligible for inclusion. Completeness of intervention was evaluated with t20he template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) and the consensus on exercise reporting template (CERT). Inter-rater agreement for each item of the tools was calculated. Results: Twenty-six RCTs were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention descriptors. On average 57.1% (6.8 ± 2.4; out of 12) of the overall TIDieR items and 35.3% (6.7 ± 2.9; out of 19) of the CERT were well described. In particular, 7 and 5 items were completely reported more than 50% of the time for the TIDieR and CERT, respectively. Frequent shortcomings were the undetailed reporting of information regarding tailoring and modifications of exercises and their adherence. Detailed descriptions of exercise repetitions to enable replication were missing in 53.8%. According to the CERT, only 11.5% of the RCTs sufficiently described the main providers' characteristics. Conclusion:The completeness of PFMT reporting for women with POP is still below desirable standards and it is insufficient to ensure transferability into practice. The present results may add relevant knowledge and contribute to improving adequate reporting of exercise.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

Reporting of interventions used in anesthesiology trials: analysis using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist

Cited by 7 publications

References 5 publications

Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals

Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals

Thoracic surgery in Egypt

Completeness of exercise reporting among randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About