Reporting of clinical trials in nursing journals: how are we doing?

Gray, Richard; Badnapurkar, Ashish; Thomas, Dona

doi:10.1111/jan.13149

Cited by 11 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gray et al. () suggest that detailed information on adjustments to the study protocol should be given to keep on ensuring the quality of the study. In this study, two important adjustments took place.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As previous results indicated, implementing the bedside handover requires organizational changes and changes in nursing skills and attitude (Malfait et al, under review). Gray et al (2017) suggest that detailed information on adjustments to the study protocol should be given to keep on ensuring the quality of the study. In this study, two important adjustments took place.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally to retain a high standard of rigour in the study and the reporting of the results, several recommendations were followed (Gray, Badnapurkar, & Thomas, 2017). First, the trial was registered (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02714582).…”

Section: Validity and Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

Malfait

Eeckloo

Biesen

et al. 2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To investigate the effectiveness of bedside handovers. For nurses, effects on nurse–patient communication, individualized care, coordination of the care process, job satisfaction, intention to leave, patient participation and work interruptions were measured. For patients, effects on patient activation, individualized care and quality of care were measured. Design This is a longitudinal, controlled, multicentred study on 13 nursing wards in five hospitals. The seven interventional wards consisted of two medical rehabilitation, two geriatric and three surgical/medical wards. Methods A questionnaire for patients and nurses at baseline (May–June 2016), 3 (July–August 2017) and 9 months (December 2017–January 2018) after implementation was completed by 799 patients and 165 nurses. Per protocol analysis was used in combination with linear mixed models analysis. Results With exception for work interruptions and patient participation for nurses, no overall effects could be found for both patients and nurses. For nurses, patient participation increased, and work interruptions decreased in the intervention group. Individualized care remained stable in the intervention group, whereas it decreased in the control group. Conclusion The results indicate that bedside handover can be regarded as superior to more commonly used handover models as it enhances patient participation and decreases work interruptions. However, the positive image of bedside handovers, mostly based on observational, short‐term and single‐centred experiences, cannot be confirmed as there were no effects on any of the other measured parameters. As bedside handovers put patient participation on the agenda and negative effects are absent, implementing bedside handovers should be considered a mean for more patient‐centeredness instead of a goal itself.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

Malfait

Eeckloo

Biesen

et al. 2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With colleagues I recently published an audit of trial reporting in the Journal of Advanced Nursing ( JAN ) (Gray, Badnapurkar, & Thomas, 2016). Of the 44 trials published in JAN over the last 5 years, 70% were not registered.…”

Section: How Is Nursing Doing?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Moths to a Flame: How We Can Improve the Quality of Clinical Trial Reporting in Nursing Journals

Gray¹

2016

Nurse Author & Editor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Gray, Badnapurkar, and Thomas () investigated clinical trial reporting in the Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) over the past five years. Their results reflect the concerns driving the AllTrials campaign: 70% of the trials reported in JAN had not been registered; only 9% of the authors had published the trial protocol; 77% reported positive findings; and only 16% of the published studies reported adverse events.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

All trials registered, all results reported

Pierson¹

2017

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reporting of clinical trials in nursing journals: how are we doing?

Cited by 11 publications

References 3 publications

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

Moths to a Flame: How We Can Improve the Quality of Clinical Trial Reporting in Nursing Journals

All trials registered, all results reported

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About