Reporting Conflicts of Interest

Daube, Mike; Chapman, Simon

doi:10.2105/ajph.2020.306046

Am J Public Health

2021

DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.306046

|View full text |Cite

Reporting Conflicts of Interest

Mike Daube

Simon Chapman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was chaired by Rob Moodie [8]. (iii) In referring to the Australian Tobacco Harm Reduction Association (' ATHRA') organization, albeit without noting that according to evidence to a Parliamentary committee from its current Chair it has no members [9], they note its funding from vaping companies-but not funding from the UK-based Knowledge-Action-Change (KAC) organization, which has received substantial funding from a Philip Morris front group [10]. (iv) Their reference 39 to an article by Chapman does not seem to have been checked.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correcting errors

Daube

Chapman

2021

Addiction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We write to express concern about errors in a recent paper by Berridge et al. [1], and request that these be corrected.There is always scope for discussion about historical processes and how they should be interpreted. It is, however, disappointing that so much of the information in relation to both Australia and ourselves is wrong or misleading.The authors write that: 'Mike Daube and Simon Chapman… have publicly supported the sales ban on ENDS', albeit without providing any references. This significantly misrepresents the position we have both taken from the outset of policy debate about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). We have consistently been scrupulous in arguing for appropriate ENDS regulation. We have argued that final decisions should be left to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and we have supported the TGA's decision to enable access subject to specific conditions. We have emphasized that this is not to be equated with calling for a ban. For example, in our submission to the recent Senate Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction, we wrote: 'We have noted much commentary in which the proposed TGA via prescription proposal is described as a "ban" on nicotine vaping in Australia. This is palpable nonsense. The proposal is no more a ban on vapable nicotine than the TGA scheduling of all prescribed drugs is a "ban" on accessing the vast array of prescription medicines that are used every day by millions of Australians who have obtained authority to do so by their doctor'. We made similar comments to a 2017 Parliamentary Inquiry [2,3].They wrongly assert that ' ASH opposed tobacco harm reduction in the 1970s (under Mike Daube)'. I (MD) was

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correcting errors

Daube

Chapman

2021

Addiction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Reporting Conflicts of Interest

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Correcting errors

Correcting errors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About