2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2004.00164.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting and the Politics of Difference: (Non)Disclosure on Ethnic Minorities

Abstract: This article is based on two related research questions. First, what is the level of disclosure on ethnic minorities in the two sectors of the U.K. economy that historically have employed the most ethnic minorities: the banking and retail sectors? And secondly, what influences the (non)disclosure? It specifically investigates the level of disclosures from 1935 to 1998 and situates them within the changing social, political and economic context of this period. It is contended that the changing pattern of disclo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The accounting literature does contain some research on human rights, although not always labelled as such. Adams and McPhail (2004) provide an analysis of corporate engagement with discrimination. However, a discussion that seeks to frame corporate social responsibility in terms of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is substantively missing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The accounting literature does contain some research on human rights, although not always labelled as such. Adams and McPhail (2004) provide an analysis of corporate engagement with discrimination. However, a discussion that seeks to frame corporate social responsibility in terms of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is substantively missing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency, stakeholder, institutional, legitimacy and political economy theories have all been used in the past to enhance our understanding of disclosure practices, particularly with respect to disclosures of voluntary, non-financial information (see, for example Davis, Schoorman & Donaldson, 1997;Deegan & Rankin, 1996;Hopwood, 2009;Larrinaga-González, Carrasco-Fenech, Caro-Gonzalez, Correa-Ruýz and Paez-Sandubete, 2001). A number of studies have concluded that whilst any one of these theories on their own have limited explanatory power, they do, when considered together, shed some light on corporate voluntary, non-financial disclosures (see, for example, Gray, Adams & Owen, 2014;Adams & Harte, 1998;Adams & McPhail, 2004). Adams and Whelan (2009) observe that much of the research and the theoretical perspectives used to examine the voluntary disclosure of non-financial information concludes that organisations tend to act in self-interested ways, particularly in seeking to maximise financial outcomes such as profit.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature considers factors influencing sustainability accounting and reporting (see, for example, Deegan, 2002;Adams and McPhail, 2004). The focus of these studies has largely been on factors external to the organisation rather than internal processes (but see Williams and Adams, 2013) and few studies have examined the process of organisational change to embed sustainability practices in organisations (but see Adams and McNicholas, 2007;Gray et al, 1995;Larrinaga-González et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%