2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05886.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporter transgenic mouse models highlight the dual endocrine and neural facet of GnRH receptor function

Abstract: In the pituitary of mammals, the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) plays crucial roles in the neuroendocrine control of reproductive function. This receptor is specifically expressed by the gonadotrope cells scattered among the five other endocrine cell types constituting the anterior pituitary; it is also expressed in other organs, such as the gonads and brain where its function is not well defined. To gain insight into GnRHR function, distribution, and regulation, several transgenic approaches have been developed using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transgene expression was directed to pituitary gonadotrope cells in both mouse lines, thus supporting our in vitro data in gonadotrope cell lines, indicating that the 1.1 kb promoter sequence was necessary and sufficient for pituitary-specific expression (Granger et al 2004). Recently, we have reported transgene expression in the testis (Schang et al 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transgene expression was directed to pituitary gonadotrope cells in both mouse lines, thus supporting our in vitro data in gonadotrope cell lines, indicating that the 1.1 kb promoter sequence was necessary and sufficient for pituitary-specific expression (Granger et al 2004). Recently, we have reported transgene expression in the testis (Schang et al 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These transgenic mice were initially generated to improve in vitro analyses of the mechanisms involved in promoter activity and, most importantly, to explore, in vivo, the developmental pattern of rat Gnrhr promoter activity in the pituitary (Pincas et al 2001, Granger et al 2004, Schang et al 2013a. These transgenic mice also appeared to be powerful tools to identify novel tissues in which the Gnrhr promoter is active (Schang et al 2011a(Schang et al ,b, 2013b. Two transgenic mouse lines expressing ALPP under the control of the 3.3 or 1.1 kb rat Gnrhr promoter (referred to as 3.3-Gnrhr and 1.1-Gnrhr respectively) were generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of brain GnRHR occurs after birth and is restricted to postmitotic neurons; 25 this excludes their involvement in neuronal embryonic development and suggests a possible role in postnatal development or in brain plasticity. Actually, activation of GnRHR alters the electrical properties of hippocampal neurons through a protein kinase C-dependent action 10 and exerts a significant control of synaptic plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…27 GnRH was found to regulate the expression of pre-and post-synaptic markers spinophilin, synaptophisin and Egr1 in neurons obtained from hippocampus. 25,28 Hippocampal GnRHR has been implicated in the regulation of aromatase activity, 28 suggesting that the observed neurotrophic effect of GnRH could be mediated by a possible intervention on local synthesis of estrogen, known to affect synaptogenesis and expression of both spinophilin and synaptophysin. 29 This observation also suggests that estrus cycle -dependent synaptogenesis, occurring in the rat female hippocampus, may be regulated by the cyclic release of hypothalamic GnRH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller response in the mixed cell preparation is likely due to the fact that PACAP mRNA produced by the folliculostellate cells is unchanged in response to GnRH. 7,50,51 Variations in the fold change across experiments may be the result of minor differences in the treatment protocols, such as differences in the vehicle or the length of incubation times that would have led to differences in paracrine factor involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%