2018
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reported Theory Use by Digital Interventions for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Consumption, and Association With Effectiveness: Meta-Regression

Abstract: BackgroundApplying theory to the design and evaluation of interventions is likely to increase effectiveness and improve the evidence base from which future interventions are developed, though few interventions report this.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper was to assess how digital interventions to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption report the use of theory in their development and evaluation, and whether reporting of theory use is associated with intervention effectiveness.MethodsRandomized controll… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychological theory of motivation is used to develop motivational strategies to control UAU against psychological craving for alcohol [81]. Although mHealth interventions based on theory can improve instructional design and the effect of self-control of UAU [76], no significant difference in health outcomes was found in this review for the studies based on theory and those otherwise, which is in accordance with the finding of Garnett et al [82]. There might be two reasons to explain this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Psychological theory of motivation is used to develop motivational strategies to control UAU against psychological craving for alcohol [81]. Although mHealth interventions based on theory can improve instructional design and the effect of self-control of UAU [76], no significant difference in health outcomes was found in this review for the studies based on theory and those otherwise, which is in accordance with the finding of Garnett et al [82]. There might be two reasons to explain this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, in the main Cochrane review, the trials were classified based on their longest follow-up and the change per month of follow-up in the difference in alcohol consumption between experimental and control arms was not statistically significant [52]. Other potential moderators of intervention effectiveness, such as age and gender, have been analyzed and reported in the main Cochrane review [52] and whether reported use of theory in the intervention can account for any of the heterogeneity in intervention effectiveness is analyzed in a separate paper [101]. These moderator analyses were not part of the pre-specified analysis plan and would likely over parametrize the models in the current study, whose main focus was explanatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews of behaviour change theories have noted that they are often not clearly specified nor capable of generating clear and accurate predictions [9][10][11][12][13] . Moreover, the informal ways in which they tend to be presented limit direct comparison and integration 14,15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%