1991
DOI: 10.21236/ada249652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reported Modality Preferences of Sonar Operators

Abstract: SummaryOne hundred forty-four sonar operators, 78 submarine (STS) and 66 surface (STG), completed a survey which questioned them in the areas of preferred work schedule, general modality preference, and modality preference for sonar operation.A majority of subjects reported being most alert and efficient between 8 a.m. and noon.STS operators had a strong preference for a 6 on/12 off work schedule. Responses to general modality questions indicated a preference for the visual modality, which was similar in propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moore, 1989). Indeed, because they may be perceived even when the operator's eyes are directed elsewhere, an auditory sonar display is potentially more useful than a visual sonar display (Kobus & Lewandowski, 1990). The implication of improved listener detection could lead to tactical superiority, given that the initial advantage in the sonar tactical environment typically belongs to the operator who makes the first detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore, 1989). Indeed, because they may be perceived even when the operator's eyes are directed elsewhere, an auditory sonar display is potentially more useful than a visual sonar display (Kobus & Lewandowski, 1990). The implication of improved listener detection could lead to tactical superiority, given that the initial advantage in the sonar tactical environment typically belongs to the operator who makes the first detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%