2006
DOI: 10.1080/10641950600913008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reported Calcium Intake is Reduced in Women with Preeclampsia

Abstract: The results of the present study can provide the foundations for prospective trials, including randomised clinical trials involving only patients with a low content of calcium in their diet.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies [ 20 , 26 , 35 , 36 ] reporting on the association between nutrient intake and both mild and severe pre-eclampsia were included as four separate results in meta-analyses. Another study [ 22 ] reported on dietary intake at 11–15, 26, and 34–37 weeks’ gestation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four studies [ 20 , 26 , 35 , 36 ] reporting on the association between nutrient intake and both mild and severe pre-eclampsia were included as four separate results in meta-analyses. Another study [ 22 ] reported on dietary intake at 11–15, 26, and 34–37 weeks’ gestation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of seven case–control studies [ 21 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 35 , 55 , 56 ] and six cohort studies [ 20 , 22 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 50 ] reporting on unadjusted calcium intake in HDP cases and non-cases, three case–control studies [ 28 , 55 , 56 ] and seven cohort studies [ 20 , 22 , 35 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 50 ] could be included in the meta-analysis (Figure 4 a and b, respectively). Results from case–control studies consistently showed lower reported calcium intake for HDP cases compared with non-cases, but the pooled result was not statistically significant (WMD = −39.89, 95% CI −109.52 to 29.75; I 2 36.6%; P = 0.21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Smith et al more recently demonstrated that the MDRD2 formula also underestimated measured GFR in both healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies (23). The agreement between the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD2 and 24-hour CrCl in women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy has also been found to be suboptimal[24]. While endogeneous markers of GFR, such as cystatin-C or beta trace protein, have been studied in pregnancy, they do not appear to reliably reflect renal function in this population (25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%