2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35179-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report on the Model Checking Contest at Petri Nets 2011

Abstract: Abstract. This article presents the results of the Model Checking Contest held within the SUMo 2011 workshop, a satellite event of Petri Nets 2011. This contest aimed at a fair and experimental evaluation of the performances of model checking techniques applied to Petri nets. The participating tools were compared on several examinations (state space generation, deadlock detection and evaluation of reachability formulae) run on a set of common models (Place/Transition and Symmetric Petri nets). The collected da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models are from the Petri net literature [11], we selected two instances of each of the following models: the Flexible Manufacturing System (4/5), the Kanban system (4/5), the Peterson algorithm (4/5), the slotted-ring system (6/5), the dining philosophers (9/10) and the Round-robin mutex (14/15). We also used two models from actual case studies: PolyORB [10] and MAPK [9].…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Of Tgtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are from the Petri net literature [11], we selected two instances of each of the following models: the Flexible Manufacturing System (4/5), the Kanban system (4/5), the Peterson algorithm (4/5), the slotted-ring system (6/5), the dining philosophers (9/10) and the Round-robin mutex (14/15). We also used two models from actual case studies: PolyORB [10] and MAPK [9].…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Of Tgtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models mostly come from industrial real-time case studies and the Model Checking Contest editions of 2011 [10], 2012 [11] and 2013 [12].…”
Section: A Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CosyVerif relies on Web services, the use of Coloane is not mandatory and verification services can be accessed directly The CosyVerif project also provides a repository of models, that may be used for benchmark purposes. These models mostly come from industrial real-time case studies and the Model Checking Contest in 2011 [2] and 2012 [3].…”
Section: The Cosyverif Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%