Abstract:We present a report of two patients having the association of omovertebra, Sprengel's deformity of the shoulder and Klippel–Feil abnormality with craniovertebral junctional instability. Our literature survey did not locate any report of such association. Significance of bone alterations is analyzed. Two young patients presented with neck pain, torticollis, webbed neck, and spastic quadriparesis. In both patients, the investigations revealed basilar invagination, Klippel–Feil abnormality and Sprengel's deformit… Show more
“…Also, they exhibited MRI features showing CM-1, increased BI in flexion position, and morphological anomalies on CT-scans such as C2-C3 fusions. Similar findings were observed for cases 5 and 6 with Klippel-Feil syndrome, where segmental fusions of the cervical spine are commonly found [36,37].…”
Section: Insights Of Patient Clustering and Clinical Correlationsupporting
Objective: This study aimed to assess the relevance of using multi-positional MRI (mMRI) to identify cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) instability in pediatric patients with CVJ anomalies while determining objective mMRI criteria to detect this condition. Material and Methods: Data from children with CVJ anomalies who underwent a mMRI between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Mobility assessment using mMRI involved: (1) morphometric analysis using hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis (HCPCA) to identify clusters of patients by considering their mobility similarities, assessed through delta (Δ) values of occipito-cervical parameters measured on mMRI; and (2) morphological analysis based on dynamic geometric CVJ models and analysis of displacement vectors between flexion and extension. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for occipito-cervical parameters to establish instability cut-off values. (3) Additionally, an anatomical qualitative analysis of the CVJ was performed to identify morphological criteria of instability. Results: Forty-seven patients with CVJ anomalies were included (26 females, 21 males; mean age: 10.2 years [3–18]). HCPCA identified 2 clusters: cluster №1 (stable patients, n = 39) and cluster №2 (unstable patients, n = 8). ΔpB-C2 (pB-C2 line delta) at ≥2.5 mm (AUC 0.98) and ΔBAI (Basion-axis Interval delta) ≥ 3 mm (AUC 0.97) predicted instability with 88% sensibility and 95% specificity and 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity, respectively. Geometric CVJ shape analysis differentiated patients along a continuum, from a low to a high CVJ motion that was characterized by a subluxation of C1 in the anterior direction. Qualitative analysis found correlations between instability and C2 anomalies, including fusions with C3 (body p = 0.032; posterior arch p = 0.045; inferior articular facets p = 0.012; lateral mass p = 0.029). Conclusions: We identified a cluster of pediatric patients with CVJ instability among a cohort of CVJ anomalies that were characterized by morphometric parameters with corresponding cut-off values that could serve as objective mMRI criteria. These findings warrant further validation through prospective case–control studies.
“…Also, they exhibited MRI features showing CM-1, increased BI in flexion position, and morphological anomalies on CT-scans such as C2-C3 fusions. Similar findings were observed for cases 5 and 6 with Klippel-Feil syndrome, where segmental fusions of the cervical spine are commonly found [36,37].…”
Section: Insights Of Patient Clustering and Clinical Correlationsupporting
Objective: This study aimed to assess the relevance of using multi-positional MRI (mMRI) to identify cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) instability in pediatric patients with CVJ anomalies while determining objective mMRI criteria to detect this condition. Material and Methods: Data from children with CVJ anomalies who underwent a mMRI between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Mobility assessment using mMRI involved: (1) morphometric analysis using hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis (HCPCA) to identify clusters of patients by considering their mobility similarities, assessed through delta (Δ) values of occipito-cervical parameters measured on mMRI; and (2) morphological analysis based on dynamic geometric CVJ models and analysis of displacement vectors between flexion and extension. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for occipito-cervical parameters to establish instability cut-off values. (3) Additionally, an anatomical qualitative analysis of the CVJ was performed to identify morphological criteria of instability. Results: Forty-seven patients with CVJ anomalies were included (26 females, 21 males; mean age: 10.2 years [3–18]). HCPCA identified 2 clusters: cluster №1 (stable patients, n = 39) and cluster №2 (unstable patients, n = 8). ΔpB-C2 (pB-C2 line delta) at ≥2.5 mm (AUC 0.98) and ΔBAI (Basion-axis Interval delta) ≥ 3 mm (AUC 0.97) predicted instability with 88% sensibility and 95% specificity and 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity, respectively. Geometric CVJ shape analysis differentiated patients along a continuum, from a low to a high CVJ motion that was characterized by a subluxation of C1 in the anterior direction. Qualitative analysis found correlations between instability and C2 anomalies, including fusions with C3 (body p = 0.032; posterior arch p = 0.045; inferior articular facets p = 0.012; lateral mass p = 0.029). Conclusions: We identified a cluster of pediatric patients with CVJ instability among a cohort of CVJ anomalies that were characterized by morphometric parameters with corresponding cut-off values that could serve as objective mMRI criteria. These findings warrant further validation through prospective case–control studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.