1993
DOI: 10.1017/s1049096500038075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation (HAC) for Calendar Year 1992

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A declassification unit, as recommended by HAC, had been established in the Historian's Office to accelerate the declassification process, and it seemed to be working effectively. Indeed, HAC noted "with pleasure that the thirty-year publication mark is nearly within grasp (Kimball 1994a)." HAC members were also assessing selected volumes of FRUS, having obtained access to denied documents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A declassification unit, as recommended by HAC, had been established in the Historian's Office to accelerate the declassification process, and it seemed to be working effectively. Indeed, HAC noted "with pleasure that the thirty-year publication mark is nearly within grasp (Kimball 1994a)." HAC members were also assessing selected volumes of FRUS, having obtained access to denied documents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic declassification was reduced from 30 to 25 years. Warren Kimball (1994c) has noted, that he is "absolutely certain our [HAC's] input created a large-scale serious consideration in the State Department." Indeed, the new arrangements, as Steven Aftergood of the Federation of Independent Scientists noted, represents "a distinct improvement over the current system (Jehl 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations